Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145360›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Majority and popularity effects on norm formation in adolescence.

Ana da Silva Pinho, Lucas Molleman, Barbara R Braams, Wouter van den Bos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Determinants of Rule-Breaking in Adolescence.Journal of adolescence · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Teacher knows best? The social influence of teachers and peers in high school.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Social influence in adolescence as a double-edged sword.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana da Silva PinhoDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.f.dasilvapinho@uva.nl.
Lucas MollemanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Barbara R BraamsFaculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter van den BosDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Developmental Changes in Neural Processes Underlying Inattention, Impulsivity and RegulationR01MH091068 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCHWEITZER, JULIE B. · 2012 to 2022
$7.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personal norms consist of individuals' attitudes about the appropriateness of behaviour. These norms guide adolescents' behaviour in countless domains that are fundamental for their social functioning and well-being. Peers are known to have a marked influence on adolescent risk-taking and prosocial behaviour, but little is known about how peers shape personal norms underlying those behaviours. Here we show that adolescents' personal norms are decisively moulded by the norms of the majority and popular peers in their social network. Our experiment indicates that observing peer norms substantially impacts adolescents' normative evaluation of risk-taking and prosocial behaviours. The majority norm had a stronger impact than the norm of a single popular peer, and norm adjustments were largest when adolescents observed strong disapproval of risk-taking or strong approval of prosocial behaviour. Our study suggests that learning about peer norms likely promotes adolescents to hold views and values supporting socially desirable behaviour.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSocial BehaviorSocial NormsAdolescentAttitudeFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupPeer Influence

Identifiers

PMID34145360
PMCPMC8213745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.