Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145315›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparison of microsatellite instability detection by immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques in colorectal and endometrial cancer.

Franceska Dedeurwaerdere, Kathleen Bm Claes, Jo Van Dorpe, Isabelle Rottiers, Joni Van der Meulen, Joke Breyne, Koen Swaerts, Geert Martens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Molecular subtypes and survival patterns of endometrial cancer in a South Indian cohort.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic targeting of mismatch repair-deficient cancers.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Franceska Dedeurwaerdere *Department of Pathology, AZ Delta General Hospital, Roeselare, Belgium.
Kathleen Bm Claes *Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Jo Van DorpeDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Isabelle RottiersDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Joni Van der MeulenCenter for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium.
Joke BreyneDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta General Hospital, AZ Delta General Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium.
Koen SwaertsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta General Hospital, AZ Delta General Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium.
Geert MartensDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, AZ Delta General Hospital, AZ Delta General Hospital, Deltalaan 1, 8800, Roeselare, Belgium. geert.martens@azdelta.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1208-6289
Ghent University Hospital · BEAZ Delta · BEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) testing is crucial for diagnosing Lynch syndrome and detection of microsatellite unstable (MSI) tumors eligible for immunotherapy. The aim of this study was to compare the relative diagnostic performance of three molecular MSI assays: polymerase chain reaction (PCR), MSI testing by Idylla and next-generation-sequencing (NGS) on 49 tumor samples (28 colorectal and 21 endometrial adenocarcinomas) versus immunohistochemistry (IHC). Discrepancies were investigated by MLH1 methylation analysis and integrated with germline results if available. Overall, the molecular assays achieved equivalent diagnostic performance for MSI detection with area under the ROC curves (AUC) of respectively 0.91 for Idylla and PCR, and 0.93 for NGS. In colorectal cancers with tumor cell percentages ≥ 30% all three molecular assays achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 1) versus IHC. Also, in endometrial cancers, all three molecular assays showed equivalent diagnostic performance, albeit at a clearly lower sensitivity ranging from 58% for Idylla to 75% for NGS, corresponding to negative predictive values from 78 to 86%. PCR, Idylla and NGS show similar diagnostic performance for dMMR detection in colorectal and endometrial cancers. Molecular MSI analysis has lower sensitivity for dMMR detection in endometrial cancer indicating that combined use of both IHC and molecular methods is recommended.Clinical Trial Number/IRB: B1172020000040, Ethical Committee, AZ Delta General Hospital.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEndometrial NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMicrosatellite InstabilityBiomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingComputational BiologyDisease ManagementFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34145315
PMCPMC8213758
OpenAlexW3118338742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.