Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145096›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2020

White paper on venomous snakebite in India.

Joy Kumar Chakma, Jaideep C Menon, R S Dhaliwal, Indian Council of Medical Research#

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fatal intracranial bleedings in a viper bite: A case report.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joy Kumar ChakmaDivision of Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Jaideep C MenonDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita University, Kochi, Kerala, India.
R S DhaliwalDivision of Non-Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Indian Council of Medical Research#

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venomous snakebite is one of the leading preventable causes of mortality and morbidity with tremendous socio-economic impact on the family and nation. Venomous snakebite has been relisted as a neglected tropical disease after having been removed off the list in 2013. This paper discusses the various reasons which could be attributed to the high mortality and morbidity due to venomous snakes and also provides recommendations on policy decisions, improvement on the quality of venom and anti-snake venom and in promoting awareness on how to avoid snakebite.

Indexed as

Snake BitesAnimalsAntiveninsHumansIndiaSnakesSnake VenomsAntiveninsSnake VenomsAnti-snake venomneglected tropical diseasesnakebitevenomous

Identifiers

PMID34145096
PMCPMC8224165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.