Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145033›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2021

Novel non-terminal tumor sampling procedure using fine needle aspiration supports immuno-oncology biomarker discovery in preclinical mouse models.

Suzanne Isabelle Sitnikova, Sophie Munnings-Tomes, Elena Galvani, Stacy Kentner, Kathy Mulgrew, Chris Rands, Judit España Agustí, Tianhui Zhang, Kristina M Ilieva, Guglielmo Rosignoli and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne Isabelle SitnikovaAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK suzanne.sitnikova@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4546-6122
Sophie Munnings-TomesAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Elena GalvaniAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Stacy KentnerAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Kathy MulgrewAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Chris RandsAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Judit España AgustíAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Tianhui ZhangAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Kristina M IlievaAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Guglielmo RosignoliAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Hormas GhadiallyAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew J RobinsonAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Tim SlidelAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Robert W WilkinsonAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Simon J DovediAstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBAstraZeneca (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmuno-oncology therapies are now part of the standard of care for cancer in many indications. However, durable objective responses remain limited to a subset of patients. As such, there is a critical need to identify biomarkers that can predict or enrich for treatment response. So far, the majority of putative biomarkers consist of features of the tumor microenvironment (TME). However, in preclinical mouse models, the collection of tumor tissue for this type of analysis is a terminal procedure, obviating the ability to directly link potential biomarkers to long-term treatment outcomes.

methodsTo address this, we developed and validated a novel non-terminal tumor sampling method to enable biopsy of the TME in mouse models based on fine needle aspiration.

resultsWe show that this technique enables repeated in-life sampling of subcutaneous flank tumors and yields sufficient material to support downstream analyses of tumor-infiltrating immune cells using methods such as flow cytometry and single-cell transcriptomics. Moreover, using this technique we demonstrate that we can link TME biomarkers to treatment response outcomes, which is not possible using the current method of terminal tumor sampling.

conclusionThus, this minimally invasive technique is an important refinement for the pharmacodynamic analysis of the TME facilitating paired evaluation of treatment response biomarkers with outcomes and reducing the number of animals used in preclinical research.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalHumansImmunotherapyMiceBiomarkers, Tumordrug evaluationimmunologic techniquesimmunotherapypreclinicaltumor biomarkerstumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34145033
PMCPMC8215240
OpenAlexW3168713991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.