Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34145013›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Validation of the Workplace Integrated Safety and Health (WISH) assessment in a sample of nursing homes using Item Response Theory (IRT) methods.

María Andrée López Gómez, Daniel A Gundersen, Leslie I Boden, Glorian Sorensen, Jeffrey N Katz, Jamie E Collins, Gregory Wagner, Mary G Vriniotis, Jessica Ar Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Can Better Leadership Reduce Nursing Home Staff Turnover?Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Workplace Integrated Safety and Health Program Uptake in Nursing Homes: Associations with Ownership.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

María Andrée López GómezCenter for Work, Health and Well-being, Harvard University T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA malopezgomez@mun.ca.
Daniel A GundersenSurvey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Leslie I BodenEnvironmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9779-207X
Glorian SorensenCenter for Work, Health and Well-being, Harvard University T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jeffrey N KatzOrthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jamie E CollinsOrthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Gregory WagnerCenter for Work, Health and Well-being, Harvard University T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mary G VriniotisCenter for Work, Health and Well-being, Harvard University T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jessica Ar WilliamsHealth Policy and Management, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8195-1355

Funding

The Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and WellbeingU19OH008861 · OH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2007 to 2025
$23.9M
NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH008861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo validate and test the dimensionality of six constructs from the Workplace Integrated Safety and Health (WISH) assessment, an instrument that assesses the extent to which organisations implement integrated systems approaches for protecting and promoting worker health, safety and well-being, in a sample of nursing homes in the USA.

designValidation of an assessment scale using data from a cross-sectional survey.

settingNursing homes certified by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare services in three states of the USA: Ohio, California and Massachusetts.

participants569 directors of nursing from nursing homes serving adults and with more than 30 beds participated in the study.

resultsGraded response Item Response Theory (IRT) models showed that five out of six constructs were unidimensional based on balanced interpretation of model fit statistics-M2 or C2 with p value >0.05, Comparative Fit Index >0.95, lower bound of the root mean squared error of approximation 90% CI <0.06 and standardised root mean square residual <0.08. Overall measure and construct reliability ranged from acceptable to good. Category boundary location parameters indicated that items were most informative for respondents in lower range of latent scores (ie, β

conclusionsThe WISH instrument has utility to understand to what extent organisations integrate protection and promotion of worker health, safety and well-being; however, it is most informative in organisations that present lower scores.

Indexed as

MedicareWorkplaceAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMassachusettsNursing HomesOhioPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesoccupational & industrial medicineorganisation of health servicesstatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34145013
PMCPMC8215260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.