Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34144918›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2021

Process Evaluation of a Farm-to-WIC Intervention.

Jennifer Di Noia, Dorothy Monica, Alla Sikorskii

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04038385 (WIC-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating Among Low-Income Mothers), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04038385 nacompletednot on this map

WIC-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating Among Low-Income Mothers

TypeinterventionalSponsorWilliam Paterson University of New JerseyRan2019 to 2021Enrolled297ConditionsCancer Prevention, Diet Modification, Vegetable IntakeArmsMultilevel Behavioral Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer Di NoiaDepartment of Sociology, William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ. Electronic address: dinoiaj@wpunj.edu.
Dorothy MonicaSaint Joseph's WIC Program, Paterson, NJ.
Alla SikorskiiDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Michigan State University · USWilliam Paterson University · US

Funding

WIC-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating Among Low-Income MothersR21CA230476 · NCI · WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DI NOIA, JENNIFER · 2019 to 2020
$309k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA230476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the promise of farm-to-institution interventions for addressing limited vegetable access as a barrier to intake, programs designed for the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) are lacking. As such, little is known about the implementation of, and mechanisms of action through which, farm-to-WIC interventions affect vegetable intake and participant satisfaction with such programs.

objectiveTo examine whether a farm-to-WIC intervention to promote vegetable intake was implemented as intended, differences between participants who received the intervention relative to those in a usual-care control group in intermediate outcomes of vegetable-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors, and secondary outcomes of physical activity and weight status; and participant satisfaction with the intervention.

designA process evaluation encompassing descriptive and comparative analyses of implementation fidelity logs and survey data collected as part of a pilot study was conducted. PARTICIPANTS/

settingThe setting was a large, New Jersey-based, urban WIC agency. Recruited between June 3 and August 1, 2019 through 3 of the agency's 17 sites (1 intervention and 2 control sites), participants were 297 primarily Hispanic adults (160 enrolled at the intervention site and 137 at control sites).

interventionThe intervention combined behaviorally focused instruction and handouts with the introduction of a WIC-based farmers' market, field trips to an area farmers' market, telephone coaching and support, and recipe demonstrations and tastings.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were vegetable intake (measured via self-report and objectively using dermal carotenoids as a biomarker of intake) and the redemption of vouchers provided by WIC for fruit and vegetable purchases at farmers' markets (measured objectively using data provided by WIC). For the process evaluation, logs were used to document program activities. Vegetable-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors, physical activity, and satisfaction with the intervention were assessed with participant questionnaires. Weight status was assessed with direct measures of height and weight. Data were collected at baseline and at mid- and post-intervention (3 and 6 months post-baseline, respectively). STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive statistics were used to characterize implementation fidelity. Associations between intermediate and secondary outcomes and vegetable intake were examined at baseline with Pearson correlations. Post-baseline between-group differences in the outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline values and covariates. Satisfaction with the intervention was assessed with inferential and thematic analyses.

resultsPost-intervention, measures of vegetable intake were higher in the intervention relative to the control study group. Receipt of the intervention was also associated with a greater likelihood of voucher redemption. Nearly all participants (≥94%) received the intervention as intended at the WIC-based farmers' market; smaller percentages completed 1 or more planned trips to the area farmers' market (28%) and telephone coaching and support calls (88%). Although most intermediate and secondary outcomes were associated with measures of vegetable intake at baseline, the variables did not differ between study groups post-intervention. Mean satisfaction ratings were ≥6.8 on a 7-point scale. Recipe demonstrations, learning about vegetables, field trips, and the rapport with staff were liked most about the program. Although adding days and times for field trips was suggested, limited market days and hours of operation limited the ability to do so.

conclusionsPreliminary data highlight the promise of this well-received intervention. Intermediate outcome findings suggest that other potential intervention mechanisms of action should be considered in future large-scale trials of this program. Broad-scale initiatives are needed to improve access to farmers' markets in underserved communities.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceAdultChildConsumer BehaviorDiet, HealthyFarmsFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood SupplyFruitHealth EducationHealth Plan ImplementationHumansMaleNew JerseyPatient Acceptance of Health CareFarm-to-institutionProcess evaluationVegetable intakeWIC program

Identifiers

PMID34144918
PMCPMC8463419
OpenAlexW3171182907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.