Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34144744›Full record

ReviewSeminars in vascular surgery2021

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on vascular registries and clinical trials.

Faisal Aziz, Christian-Alexander Behrendt, Kaity Sullivan, Adam W Beck, C Barry Beiles, Jon R Boyle, Kevin Mani, Ruth A Benson, Max V Wohlauer, Manar Khashram and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in vascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reply.Journal of vascular surgery · 2023
    Article
  2. One-Year Follow-Up of Vascular Intervention Trials Disrupted by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Use-Case landscape.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Faisal AzizIntegrated Vascular Surgery Program, Penn State Health Heart and Vascular Institute, Hershey, PA.
Christian-Alexander BehrendtUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; GermanVasc, Hamburg, Germany.
Kaity SullivanSociety for Vascular Surgery, Chicago, IL.
Adam W BeckDivision of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
C Barry BeilesAustralian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery, Australasian Vascular Audit, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jon R BoyleUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK; Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Staffordshire, UK.
Kevin ManiDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ruth A BensonUniversity Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, West Midlands, UK.
Max V WohlauerVascular Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO; Vascular Surgery COVID-19 Collaborative.
Manar KhashramDepartment of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, NZ.
Jens Eldrup JorgensenTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Patient Safety Organization, Society for Vascular Surgery, Rosemont, IL.
Gary W LemmonPatient Safety Organization, Society for Vascular Surgery, Rosemont, IL; Indiana University, 1801 N Senate Boulevard, D-3500, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Electronic address: glemmon@svspso.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality improvement programs and clinical trial research experienced disruption due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Vascular registries showed an immediate impact with significant declines in second-quarter vascular procedure volumes witnessed across Europe and the United States. To better understand the magnitude and impact of the pandemic, organizations and study groups sent grass roots surveys to vascular specialists for needs assessment. Several vascular registries responded quickly by insertion of COVID-19 variables into their data collection forms. More than 80% of clinical trials have been reported delayed or not started due to factors that included loss of enrollment from patient concerns or mandated institutional shutdowns, weighing the risk of trial participation on patient safety. Preliminary data of patients undergoing vascular surgery with active COVID-19 infection show inferior outcomes (morbidity) and increased mortality. Disease-specific vascular surgery study collaboratives about COVID-19 were created for the desire to study the disease in a more focused manner than possible through registry outcomes. This review describes the pandemic effect on multiple VASCUNET registries including Germany (GermanVasc), Sweden (SwedVasc), United Kingdom (UK National Vascular Registry), Australia and New Zealand (bi-national Australasian Vascular Audit), as well as the United States (Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative). We will highlight the continued collaboration of VASCUNET with the Vascular Quality Initiative in the International Consortium of Vascular Registries as part of the Medical Device Epidemiology Network coordinated registry network. Vascular registries must remain flexible and responsive to new and future real-world problems affecting vascular patients.

Indexed as

RegistriesBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19HumansProcedures and Techniques UtilizationQuality ImprovementVascular Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID34144744
PMCPMC8137351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.