Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34144717›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

How to sustainably build capacity in quality improvement within a healthcare organisation: a deep-dive, focused qualitative analysis.

Peter D Hibbert, Martin Basedow, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Louise K Wiles, Robyn Clay-Williams, Robert Padbury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Unsafe care in residential settings for older adults: a content analysis of accreditation reports.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. What Does a Systems Approach to Quality Improvement Look Like in Practice?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter D HibbertAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Peter.hibbert@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-343X
Martin BasedowAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jeffrey BraithwaiteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise K WilesAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robyn Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert PadburyDepartment of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUUniversity of South Australia · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key characteristic of healthcare systems that deliver high quality and cost performance in a sustainable way is a systematic approach to capacity and capability building for quality improvement. The aim of this research was to explore the factors that lead to successful implementation of a program of quality improvement projects and a capacity and capability building program that facilitates or support these.

methodsBetween July 2018 and February 2020, the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN), a network of health services in Adelaide, South Australia, conducted three capability-oriented capacity building programs that incorporated 82 longstanding individual quality improvement projects. Qualitative analysis of data collected from interviews of 19 project participants and four SALHN Improvement Faculty members and ethnographic observations of seven project team meetings were conducted.

resultsWe found four interacting components that lead to successful implementation of quality improvement projects and the overall program that facilitates or support these: an agreed and robust quality improvement methodology, a skilled faculty to assist improvement teams, active involvement of leadership and management, and a deep understanding that teams matter. A strong safety culture is not necessarily a pre-requisite for quality improvement gains to be made; indeed, undertaking quality improvement activities can contribute to an improved safety culture. For most project participants in the program, the time commitment for projects was significant and, at times, maintaining momentum was a challenge.

conclusionsHealthcare systems that wish to deliver high quality and cost performance in a sustainable way should consider embedding the four identified components into their quality improvement capacity and capability building strategy.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingQuality ImprovementDelivery of Health CareHumansLeadershipSouth AustraliaPatient safetyQualitative researchQuality improvementQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID34144717
PMCPMC8212075
OpenAlexW3171107794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.