ArticleBMC oral health2021
Evaluation of biofilm colonization on multi-part dental implants in a rat model.
Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of strontium/silver-based titanium surface coatings in improving antibacterial and osteogenic implant characteristics: a systematic review ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Pooled it
- Balancing Osseointegration and Infection Control: The Role of Titanium Surface Topography in Peri-Implant Biology.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- New Insights into the Antimicrobial and Wound-Healing Properties of Turmeric-Powder-DerivedBiomedicines · 2026Article
- In Vitro Antifungal Efficacy of Blue-Light Photodynamic Therapy with Curcumin and Riboflavin Formulation Activated by 450 nm Diode Laser AgainstPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Progress in visible-light-activated photocatalytic coatings to combat implant-related infections: From mechanistic to translational roadmap.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Effects of Carbonate Apatite and Bone Mixture on Bone and Soft Tissue Integration in a Rat Implant Model.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Article
- Biofilms and oral health: nanotechnology for biofilm control.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Metal-polydopamine coordinated coatings on titanium surface: enhancing corrosion resistance and biological property.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Sulfonated polyether ketone ketone (SPEKK) implant as an alternative to titanium implant-in vivo study on Wistar Albino rat mandible.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Exploring Peri-Implantitis Risk-Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Murine Models in Oral Research: A Narrative Review of Experimental Approaches and Cardiovascular Implications.Biology · 2025Review
- Antibacterial Properties of PMMA/ZnO(NanoAg) Coatings for Dental Implant Abutments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microbial dysbiosis and immune dysregulation in periodontitis and peri-implantitis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Exogenous Galectin-9 prevents peri-implantitis in rats by regulating macrophage polarization.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Assessing peri-implant bacterial community structure: the effect of microbiome sample collection method.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- A Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Bacterial Lysate versus Antibiotic Therapy in the Treatment of Experimental Peri-Implantitis in Rats.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Effect on Periodontitis of Antibiotic Therapy and Bacterial Lysate Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Induction of Experimental Peri-Implantitis with Strains Selected from the Human Oral Microbiome.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Rhamnolipid 89 Biosurfactant Is Effective againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Influence of Dental Titanium Implants with Different Surface Treatments Using Femtosecond and Nanosecond Lasers on Biofilm Formation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis are highly prevalent biofilm-associated diseases affecting the tissues surrounding dental implants. As antibiotic treatment is ineffective to fully cure biofilm mediated infections, antimicrobial modifications of implants to reduce or prevent bacterial colonization are called for. Preclinical in vivo evaluation of the functionality of new or modified implant materials concerning bacterial colonization and peri-implant health is needed to allow progress in this research field. For this purpose reliable animal models are needed.
methodsCustom made endosseous dental implants were installed in female Sprague Dawley rats following a newly established three-step implantation procedure. After healing of the bone and soft tissue, the animals were assigned to two groups. Group A received a continuous antibiotic treatment for 7 weeks, while group B was repeatedly orally inoculated with human-derived strains of Streptococcus oralis, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis for six weeks, followed by 1 week without inoculation. At the end of the experiment, implantation sites were clinically assessed and biofilm colonization was quantified via confocal laser scanning microscopy. Biofilm samples were tested for presence of the administered bacteria via PCR analysis.
resultsThe inner part of the custom made implant screw could be identified as a site of reliable biofilm formation in vivo. S. oralis and F. nucleatum were detectable only in the biofilm samples from group B animals. P. gingivalis was not detectable in samples from either group. Quantification of the biofilm volume on the implant material revealed no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. Clinical inspection of implants in group B animals showed signs of mild to moderate peri-implant mucositis (4 out of 6) whereas the mucosa of group A animals appeared healthy (8/8). The difference in the mucosa health status between the treatment groups was statistically significant (p = 0.015).
conclusionsWe developed a new rodent model for the preclinical evaluation of dental implant materials with a special focus on the early biofilm colonization including human-derived oral bacteria. Reliable biofilm quantification on the implant surface and the symptoms of peri-implant mucositis of the bacterially inoculated animals will serve as a readout for experimental evaluation of biofilm-reducing modifications of implant materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.