ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2021
Classifying depression using blood biomarkers: A large population study.
Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding depression: a comprehensive multi-cohort exploration of blood DNA methylation using machine learning and deep learning approaches.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Commonalities in frailty and psychopathology predict chronotype across severe mental disorders from a comorbidity perspective.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
- Impaired regional structure-function coupling as novel neurophenotype: mechanistic insights and diagnostic exploration in treatment-resistant depression.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning model for obesity-depression comorbidity in Korean and US adults.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Risk model for depression in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A retrospective cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Article
- NHANES 2005-2018 data reveal high albumin-bilirubin scores are associated with depression.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Association between red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and depression: a cross-sectional analysis among US adults, 2011-2018.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Developing and validating a nomogram prediction model for osteoporosis risk in the UK biobank: a national prospective cohort.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Prioritizing Patient Selection in Clinical Trials: A Machine Learning Algorithm for Dynamic Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality for ICU Admitted Patients Using Repeated Measurement Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The correlation between systemic immune-inflammation index and major depression in patients with depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Revealing the Causal Relationship Between Differential White Blood Cell Counts and Depression: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Depression and anxiety · 2025Article
- Association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the risk of early-onset post-stroke depression: a prospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Association between depression and liver function biomarkers among US cancer survivors in NHANES 2005-2020.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Depression and cognition are associated with lipid dysregulation in both a multigenerational study of depression and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based predictive modeling of depression in hypertensive populations.PloS one · 2022Article
- Association Between Red Cell Index and Depressive Symptoms in NHANES (2005-2018): A Cross-sectional Study.Cancer nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a common mood disorder characterized by persistent low mood or lack of interest in activities. People with other chronic medical conditions such as obesity and diabetes are at greater risk of depression. Diagnosing depression can be a challenge for primary care providers and others who lack specialized training for these disorders and have insufficient time for in-depth clinical evaluation. We aimed to create a more objective low-cost diagnostic tool based on patients' characteristics and blood biomarkers.
methodsBlood biomarker results were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 2007-2016). A prediction model utilizing random forest (RF) in NHANES (2007-2014) to identify depression was derived and validated internally using out-of-bag technique. Afterwards, the model was validated externally using a validation dataset (NHANES, 2015-2016). We performed four subgroup comparisons (full dataset, overweight and obesity dataset (BMI≥25), diabetes dataset, and metabolic syndrome dataset) then selected features using backward feature selection from RF.
resultsFamily income, Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), glucose, Triglyceride, red cell distribution width (RDW), creatinine, Basophils count or percent, Eosinophils count or percent, and Bilirubin were the most important features from four models. In the training set, AUC from full, overweight and obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome datasets were 0.83, 0.80, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively. In the validation set, AUC were 0.69, 0.63, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively.
conclusionResults of routine blood laboratory tests had good predictive value for distinguishing depression cases from control groups not only in the general population, but also individuals with metabolism-related chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.