Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34143813›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Use of comorbidity indices in patients with any cancer, breast cancer, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer: A systematic review.

Maribel Salas, Mackenzie Henderson, Meera Sundararajan, Nora Tu, Zahidul Islam, Mina Ebeid, Laura Horne

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Breast Cancer After Reduction Mammoplasty: A Population-Based Analysis of Incidence, Treatment and Screening Patterns.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maribel SalasGlobal Epidemiology, Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.
Mackenzie HendersonGlobal Epidemiology, Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4401-8259
Meera SundararajanGlobal Epidemiology, Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.
Nora TuGlobal Epidemiology, Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.
Zahidul IslamGlobal Epidemiology, Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.
Mina EbeidClinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.
Laura HorneGlobal Epidemiology, Clinical Safety and Pharmacovigilance, Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify comorbidity indices that have been validated in cancer populations, with a focus on breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN AND

settingA systematic review of the literature on the use of comorbidity indices in any cancer, breast cancer, and HER2+ breast cancer using Ovid and PubMed.

resultsThe final data set comprised 252 articles (252 any cancer, 39 breast cancer, 7 HER2+ breast cancer). The most common cancers assessed were hematologic and breast, and the most common comorbidity index used was the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) or a CCI derivative. Most validity testing of comorbidity indices used predictive validity based on survival outcomes. Hazard ratios for survival outcomes generally found that a higher comorbidity burden (measured by CCI) increased mortality risk in patients with breast cancer. All breast-cancer studies that validated comorbidity indices used CCI-based indices. Only one article validated a comorbidity index in HER2+ breast cancer.

conclusionCCI-based indices are the most appropriate indices to use in the general breast-cancer population. There is insufficient validation of any comorbidity index in HER2+ breast cancer to provide a recommendation, indicating a future need to validate these instruments in this population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsComorbidityErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID34143813
PMCPMC8213062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.