Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34143776›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Predictors of compliance with COVID-19 related non-pharmaceutical interventions among university students in the United States.

Spencer G Shumway, Jonas D Hopper, Ethan R Tolman, Daniel G Ferguson, Gabriella Hubble, David Patterson, Jamie L Jensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The next viral pandemic-where do we stand?Folia microbiologica · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The COVID-19 Health Protocol among University Students: Case Studies in Three Cities in Indonesia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Spencer G ShumwayDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Jonas D HopperDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Ethan R TolmanDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Daniel G FergusonDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Gabriella HubbleDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
David PattersonDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.
Jamie L JensenDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2249-0405
Brigham Young University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The world is currently dealing with a devastating pandemic. Although growing COVID-19 case numbers, deaths, and hospitalizations are concerning, this spread is particularly alarming in the United States where polarizing opinions, changing policies, and misinformation abound. In particular, American college campuses have been a venue of rampant transmission, with concerning spillover into surrounding, more vulnerable, communities. We surveyed over 600 college students from across the United States and modeled predictors of compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions. We identified concern with severity, constitutionalism, news exposure, and religiosity as significant positive correlates with compliance, and general trust in science as a significant negative correlate. To determine how applicable nationwide modeling might be to individual local campuses we also administered this same survey to nearly 600 students at two large universities in Utah County. In this population, concern with severity was the only significant positive correlate with compliance; Additionally, feelings of inconvenience were negatively correlated. The effects of feelings of inconvenience, and news exposure were significantly different between populations. These results suggest that we should focus our efforts on increasing knowledge about the pandemic's effects on our society and informing about constitutionality amongst college students. However, we also show that nationwide surveys and modeling are informative, but if campuses are to efficiently curb the spread of COVID-19 this coming semester, they would be best served to utilize data collected from their student populations as these might significantly differ from general consensus data.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalPandemicsPopulation SurveillanceSARS-CoV-2StudentsUnited StatesUtahYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34143776
PMCPMC8213108
OpenAlexW3172936512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.