Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34143540›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Improved normalization of lesioned brains via cohort-specific templates.

Ioannis Pappas, Henrik Hector, Kari Haws, Brian Curran, Andrew S Kayser, Mark D'Esposito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The elusive metric of lesion load.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ioannis PappasDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0168-7014
Henrik HectorDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
Kari HawsDepartment of Neurology, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, California, USA.
Brian CurranDepartment of Neurology, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, California, USA.
Andrew S KayserDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5102-2136
Mark D'EspositoDepartment of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
VA Northern California Health Care System · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Working Memory and Prefrontal CortexR01MH063901 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Developing Behavioral and Neuroimaging Predictors of Stroke RecoveryI01RX002783 · VA · VA NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE SYS · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2019 to 2023
–
NIH HHS MH63901NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063901RRD VA I01 RX002783VA RX002783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In MRI studies, spatial normalization is required to infer results at the group level. In the presence of a brain lesion, such as in stroke patients, the normalization process can be affected by tissue loss, spatial deformations, signal intensity changes, and other stroke sequelae that introduce confounds into the group analysis results. Previously, most neuroimaging studies with lesioned brains have used normalization methods optimized for intact brains, raising potential concerns about the accuracy of the resulting transformations and, in turn, their reported group level results. In this study, we demonstrate the benefits of creating an intermediate, cohort-specific template in conjunction with diffeomorphism-based methods to normalize structural MRI images in stroke patients. We show that including this cohort-specific template improves accuracy compared to standard methods for normalizing lesioned brains. Critically, this method reduces overall differences in normalization accuracy between stroke patients and healthy controls, and may improve the localization and connectivity of BOLD signal in functional neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesDatasets as TopicHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingStrokealgorithmdiffeomorphismfMRIlesionnormalizationstroketemplate

Identifiers

PMID34143540
PMCPMC8356997
OpenAlexW3166392803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.