Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34143521›Full record

ArticleAnimal genetics2021

Standardization of a SNP panel for parentage verification and identification in the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus).

M de Groot, H Anderson, H Bauer, C Bauguil, R R Bellone, R Brugidou, R M Buckley, P Dovč, O Forman, R A Grahn and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Revolution of Animal Genomics in Forensic Sciences.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

M de GrootMolGen, Traverse 2, Veenendaal, Utrecht, 3905NL, The Netherlands.
H AndersonWisdom Health, Helsinki, 00290, Finland.
H BauerLaboklin GMBH & Co. KG, Bad Kissingen, 97688, Germany.
C BauguilAveyron Labo, Rodez, 12031, France.
R R BelloneVeterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
R BrugidouAveyron Labo, Rodez, 12031, France.
R M BuckleyDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
P DovčDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
O FormanWisdom Health, Helsinki, 00290, Finland.
R A GrahnVeterinary Genetics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
L KockNeogen Genomics, Lincoln, NE, 68504, USA.
M LongeriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, 20133, Italy.
S Mouysset-GeniezAveyron Labo, Rodez, 12031, France.
J QiuNeogen Genomics, Lincoln, NE, 68504, USA.
G SofronidisOrivet Genetic Pet Care, Suite St. Kilda, Melbourne, Vic., 3182, Australia.
L H P van der GoorVHLGenetics, Wageningen, NL, 6708 PW, The Netherlands.
L A LyonsDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Itron (France) · FRMissouri College · USUniversity of California, Davis · USWisdom Health (United States) · USBiotechnical Educational Centre Ljubljana · SIFrutarom (Netherlands) · NLGenetic Technologies (Australia) · AUKeyGene (Netherlands) · NLLaboklin (Germany) · DENeogen (United States) · USUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

University of Missouri, Gilbreath McLorn Endowment
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) is a valued companion animal throughout the world. Over 60 different cat breeds are accepted for competition by the cat fancy registries in different countries. Genetic markers, including short tandem repeats and SNPs, are available to evaluate and manage levels of inbreeding and genetic diversity, population and breed structure relationships, and individual identification for forensic and registration purposes. The International Society of Animal Genetics (ISAG) hosts the Applied Genetics in Companion Animals Workshop, which supports the standardization of genetic marker panels and genotyping for the identification of cats via comparison testing. SNP panels have been in development for many species, including the domestic cat. An ISAG approved core panel of SNPs for use in cat identification and parentage analyses is presented. SNPs (n = 121) were evaluated by different university-based and commercial laboratories using 20 DNA samples as part of the ISAG comparison testing procedures. Different SNP genotyping technologies were examined, including DNA arrays, genotyping-by-sequencing and mass spectroscopy, to select a robust and efficient panel of 101 SNPs as the ISAG core panel for cats. The SNPs are distributed across all chromosomes including two on the X chromosome and an XY pseudo-autosomal sexing marker (zinc-finger XY; ZFXY). A population study demonstrated that the markers have an average polymorphic information content of 0.354 and a power of exclusion greater than 0.9999. The SNP panel should keep testing affordable while also allowing for the development of additional panels to monitor health, phenotypic traits, hybrid cats and highly inbred cats.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersGenotyping TechniquesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBreedingCatsGenetics, PopulationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisGenetic MarkersbreedsDNA profilegenetic testingsingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID34143521
PMCPMC8519126
OpenAlexW3171564777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.