Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34143373›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Explaining a model predicting quality of surgical practice: a first presentation to and review by clinical experts.

Arthur Derathé, Fabian Reche, Pierre Jannin, Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry, Bernard Gibaud, Sandrine Voros

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur DerathéUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Fabian RecheUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Pierre JanninUniversité Rennes 1, LTSI, UMR_S 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Alexandre Moreau-GaudryUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Bernard GibaudUniversité Rennes 1, LTSI, UMR_S 1099, 35000, Rennes, France.
Sandrine VorosUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, 38000, Grenoble, France. sandrine.voros@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7418-2367
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble · FRInserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

Investissements d'Avenir Programme (FR) (Labex CAMI) ANR- 11-LABX-0004MIAI @ Grenoble Alpes ANR-19-P3IA-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical Data Science (SDS) is an emerging research domain offering data-driven answers to challenges encountered by clinicians during training and practice. We previously developed a framework to assess quality of practice based on two aspects: exposure of the surgical scene (ESS) and the surgeon's profile of practice (SPP). Here, we wished to investigate the clinical relevance of the parameters learned by this model by (1) interpreting these parameters and identifying associated representative video samples and (2) presenting this information to surgeons in the form of a video-enhanced questionnaire. To our knowledge, this is the first approach in the field of SDS for laparoscopy linking the choices made by a machine learning model predicting surgical quality to clinical expertise.

methodSpatial features and quality of practice scores extracted from labeled and segmented frames in 30 laparoscopic videos were used to predict the ESS and the SPP. The relationships between the inputs and outputs of the model were then analyzed and translated into meaningful sentences (statements, e.g., "To optimize the ESS, it is very important to correctly handle the spleen"). Representative video clips illustrating these statements were semi-automatically identified. Eleven statements and video clips were used in a survey presented to six experienced digestive surgeons to gather their opinions on the algorithmic analyses.

resultsAll but one of the surgeons agreed with the proposed questionnaire overall. On average, surgeons agreed with 7/11 statements.

conclusionThis proof-of-concept study provides preliminary validation of our model which has a high potential for use to analyze and understand surgical practices.

Indexed as

LaparoscopySurgeonsClinical CompetenceHumansVideo RecordingExplainable artificial intelligenceSurgical skillsVideo-based assessment

Identifiers

PMID34143373
OpenAlexW3166780639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.