Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34143310›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2022

Clinical predictive model of lumbar curve Cobb angle below selective fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal multicenter descriptive study.

Federico Solla, Walid Lakhal, Christian Morin, Jerome Sales de Gauzy, Gaby Kreichati, Ibrahim Obeid, Stéphane Wolff, Joël Lechevallier, Henry F Parent, Jean-Luc Clément and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Federico SollaPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, Lenval University Children's Hospital, Nice, France.
Walid LakhalPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Tours, Clocheville, France.
Christian MorinPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, Institut Calot, Fondation Hopale, Berk, France.
Jerome Sales de GauzyPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Gaby KreichatiHôtel-Dieu de France, Beyrouth, Lebanon.
Ibrahim ObeidSpine Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Stéphane WolffSpine Surgery Unit, Saint Joseph hospital, Paris, France.
Joël LechevallierPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Henry F ParentSpine Surgery Unit, Trélazé, France.
Jean-Luc ClémentPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, Lenval University Children's Hospital, Nice, France.
Carlo M BertoncelliPediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Unit, Lenval University Children's Hospital, Nice, France. bertoncelli@unice.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9689-0209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo implement a clinically applicable, predictive model for the lumbar Cobb angle below a selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

methodsA series of 146 adolescents with Lenke 1 or 2 idiopathic scoliosis, surgically treated with posterior selective fusion, and minimum follow-up of 5 years (average 7) was analyzed. The cohort was divided in 2 groups: if lumbar Cobb angle at last follow-up was, respectively, ≥ or < 10°. A logistic regression-based prediction model (PredictMed) was implemented to identify variables associated with the group ≥ 10°. The guidelines of the TRIPOD statement were followed.

resultsMean Cobb angle of thoracic main curve was 56° preoperatively and 25° at last follow-up. Mean lumbar Cobb angle was 33° (20; 59) preoperatively and 11° (0; 35) at last follow-up. 53 patients were in group ≥ 10°. The 2 groups had similar demographics, flexibility of both main and lumbar curves, and magnitude of the preoperative main curve, p > 0.1. From univariate analysis, mean magnitude of preoperative lumbar curves (35° vs. 30°), mean correction of main curve (65% vs. 58%), mean ratio of main curve/distal curve (1.9 vs. 1.6) and distribution of lumbar modifiers were statistically different between groups (p < 0.05). PredictMed identified the following variables significantly associated with the group ≥ 10°: main curve % correction at last follow-up (p = 0.01) and distal curve angle (p = 0.04) with a prediction accuracy of 71%.

conclusionThe main modifiable factor influencing uninstrumented lumbar curve was the correction of main curve. The clinical model PredictMed showed an accuracy of 71% in prediction of lumbar Cobb angle ≥ 10° at last follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Longitudinal comparative study.

Indexed as

KyphosisScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisLumbar curvePredictive modelSelective fusionUninstrumented curve

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.