ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021
Preference and willingness to pay of female college students for human papillomavirus vaccination in Zhejiang Province, China: A discrete choice experiment.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Acceptance and the willingness to pay for human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine: A systematic review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Pooled it
- Human papillomavirus and vaccine knowledge, willingness, and uptake among university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Willingness to pay for vaccines in China: A systematic review and single-arm Bayesian meta-analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among health and medical college students: A discrete choice experiment.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Literature Review and Policy Recommendations for Single-Dose HPV Vaccination Schedule in China: Opportunities and Challenges.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Analyzing HPV Vaccination Service Preferences among Female University Students in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Parental preferences for rotavirus vaccination for their children under 5 years old in China: A discrete choice experiment.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023Article
- Preferences for Sexually Transmitted Infection and Cancer Vaccines in the United States and in China.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to quantify the preferences of female college students for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in Zhejiang Province, China, using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). One medical college and one nonmedical college were selected using convenience sampling, and the respondents were identified using stratified cluster sampling. A DCE focused on vaccine-related and service-related attributes was conducted in 2019. Latent class analysis was used to estimate the vaccine-related attributes, and conditional logistic regression was used to construct the choice model for the service-related attributes. In total, 850 female college students finished the study. Two latent classes were identified. Those who had more knowledge of HPV and felt more pressure about the related infection and diseases had a significantly higher chance of belonging to class 1 and were more likely to choose vaccination (percentages of respondents choosing no vaccination was 1.1% in class 1 versus 84.7% in class 2,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.