Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142925›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Attitudes of health care professionals towards COVID-19 vaccine - a sequence from Turkey.

Muhammet Ali Oruç, Onur Öztürk

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05479383 (Tobacco Use and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccinations in Finland), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05479383 unknown statusnot on this map

Tobacco Use and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccinations in Finland: a General Population Study

TypeobservationalSponsorFinnish Institute for Health and WelfareRan2017 to 2023Enrolled42,935ConditionsCOVID-19, Smoking, Tobacco Use, Vaccination RefusalArmsNot applicable, this is an observational study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Muhammet Ali OruçFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4320-8579
Onur ÖztürkDepartment of Family Medicine, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3371-6051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward the COVID -19 vaccine, which has been introduced to healthcare professionals at the beginning of 2021 and give information to them on the disease and vaccine. This cross-sectional analytical study has been performed by conducting an online survey to the healthcare professionals who work at the healthcare institutions in the province of Samsun in Turkey between December 2020 and January 2021. In addition to sixteen questions about the demographic characteristics, the "Attitudes towards the COVID -19 vaccine" scale has been used. MANOVA test and Spearman rho correlation coefficient were used in analytical examinations. A total of 1426 healthcare professional have been reached. 64.3% of participants were female, 44.1% were nurse/midwife and 66.6% were public employees. Regarding the questions in the sub-dimension of positive attitude, the rate of response of "I agree/I strongly agree" was between 40.6% and 54.6%. Positive attitude mean values differ according to gender, age, institution, presence of children, smoking status, being a relative who died due to COVID -19, and profession (respectively

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAttitudeChildCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2TurkeyVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesattitudeCOVID −19professionalvaccine

Identifiers

PMID34142925
PMCPMC8437529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.