Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142900›Full record

ArticleJournal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists2021

Three-Dimensional Holographic Guidance, Navigation, and Control (3D-GNC) for Endograft Positioning in Porcine Aorta: Feasibility Comparison With 2-Dimensional X-Ray Fluoroscopy.

Karl West, Sara Al-Nimer, Vikash R Goel, Jeffrey H Yanof, Aydan T Hanlon, Crew J Weunski, Jackie Kattar, Behzad S Farivar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A New Method for Common Femoral Arterial Access Using a Mixed Reality-Assisted Technique on a Phantom Model.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Using a novel three-dimensional holographic technology to perform open vascular surgery procedures.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karl WestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sara Al-NimerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Vikash R GoelCenterline Biomedical, Inc, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jeffrey H YanofDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aydan T HanlonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Crew J WeunskiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jackie KattarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Behzad S FarivarDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-9647
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

3D Holographic Guidance, Navigation, and Control (3D GN&C) for Endovascular Aortic Repair (EVAR)R41HL139290 · NHLBI · CENTERLINE BIOMEDICAL, INC. · PI WEST, KARL · 2018 to 2018
$224k
NHLBI NIH HHS R41 HL139290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIntraprocedural deployment of endovascular devices during complex aortic repair with 2-dimensional (2D) x-ray fluoroscopic guidance poses challenges in terms of accurate delivery system positioning and increased risk of x-ray radiation exposure with prolonged fluoroscopy times, particularly in unfavorable anatomy. The objective of this study was to assess feasibility of using an augmented reality (AR) system to position and orient a modified aortic endograft delivery system in comparison with standard fluoroscopy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe 3-dimensional guidance, navigation, and control (3D-GNC) prototype system was developed for eventual integration with the Intra-Operative Positioning System (IOPS, Centerline Biomedical, Cleveland, OH) to project spatially registered 3D holographic representations of the subject-specific aorta for intraoperative guidance and coupled with an electromagnetically (EM) tracked delivery system for intravascular navigation. Numerical feedback for controlling the endograft landing zone distance and ostial alignment was holographically projected on the operative field. Visualization of the holograms was provided via a commercially available AR headset. A Zenith Spiral-Z AAA limb stent-graft was modified with a scallop, 6 degree-of-freedom EM sensor for tracking, and radiopaque markers for fluoroscopic visualization. In vivo, 10 interventionalists independently positioned and oriented the delivery system to the ostia of renal or visceral branch vessels in anesthetized swine via open femoral artery access using 3D-GNC and standard fluoroscopic guidance. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, cumulative air kerma, and contrast material volume were recorded for each technique. Positioning and orientation accuracy was determined by measuring the target landing-zone distance error (δ

resultsTechnical success for the use of 3D-GNC to orient and position the endovascular device at each renal-visceral branch ostium was 100%. 3D-GNC resulted in 56% decrease in procedure time in comparison with standard fluoroscopic guidance (p<0.001). The 3D-GNC system was used without fluoroscopy or contrast-dye administration. Positioning accuracy was comparable for both techniques (p=0.86), while overall orientation accuracy was improved with the 3D-GNC system by 41.5% (p=0.008).

conclusionsThe holographic 3D-GNC system demonstrated improved accuracy of aortic stent-graft positioning with significant reductions in fluoroscopy time, contrast-dye administration, and procedure time.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresAnimalsAortaFeasibility StudiesFluoroscopyImaging, Three-DimensionalStentsSwineTreatment OutcomeX-Raysaugmented realityelectromagnetic navigation systemendovascular aortic repairhologrammixed reality

Identifiers

PMID34142900
PMCPMC8922995
OpenAlexW3173024506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.