Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142678›Full record

ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2021

How workers' emotional dissonance explains the association between customers' relations, burnout and health in an Italian supermarket chain.

Michela Vignoli, Greta Mazzetti, Daniela Converso, Dina Guglielmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michela VignoliDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento. michela.vignoli@unitn.it.
Greta MazzettiUniversity of Bologna. greta.mazzetti@unibo.it.
Daniela ConversoUniversity of Turin. daniela.converso@unito.it.
Dina GuglielmiUniversity of Bologna. dina.guglielmi@unibo.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDealing with customers has increasingly became a risk factor that organisations should be aware of. Having to deal with difficult customers, pupils, patients it has been found to be the second most frequent reported risk factor in the recent 2019 ESENER survey (61%, up from 58%), just after repetitive hand or arm movements.

objectivesThe aim of the present study is to explore the relationship between negative relations with customers and its association with employees' burnout and general health.

methodsData were collected using an anonymous, self-report questionnaire employed in an Italian company working in the large-scale retail sector. The sample was composed of 610 employees (70% women) working in 28 supermarkets.

resultsResults showed that negative customer relations were associated to higher levels of emotional dissonance (b = .25; p = .000), which in turn was associated with higher levels of burnout (b = .72; p = .017) and consequently to higher levels of poor general health (b = .03; p = .000).

conclusionThis study contributed to the current understanding of how negative relationship with clients could trigger a health impairment process which could lead to higher levels of burnout and poorer general health in employees. Findings suggest that organizations whose employees' work activities are characterized by a daily contact with customers should implement interventions such as training activities in order to enhance the employees' skills in dealing with custumers, for example on how to manage emotions at work.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalFood MarketsEmotionsFemaleHumansItalyMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34142678
PMCPMC8223935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.