Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142317›Full record

ReviewPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2021

A review of dosimetric impact of implementation of model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) for HDR brachytherapy.

Yousif A M Yousif, Alexander F I Osman, Mohammed A Halato

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Re-evaluation ofPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Dosimetric comparison of AcurosJournal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yousif A M Yousif *Department of Radiation Oncology, North West Cancer Centre-Tamworth Hospital, Tamworth, Australia. yousif.yousif@health.nsw.gov.au.
Alexander F I Osman *Department of Medical Physics, Al-Neelain University, 11121, Khartoum, Sudan. alexanderfadul@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-475X
Mohammed A HalatoDepartment of Medical Physics, Al-Neelain University, 11121, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To obtain dose distributions more physically representative to the patient anatomy in brachytherapy, calculation algorithms that can account for heterogeneity are required. The current standard AAPM Task Group No 43 (TG-43) dose calculation formalism has some clinically relevant dosimetric limitations. Lack of tissue heterogeneity and scattered dose corrections are the major weaknesses of the TG-43 formalism and could lead to systematic dose errors in target volumes and organs at risk. Over the last decade, model-based dose calculation algorithms (MBDCAs) have been clinically offered as complementary algorithms beyond the TG43 formalism for high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatment planning. These algorithms provide enhanced dose calculation accuracy by using the information in the patient's computed tomography images, which allows modeling the patient's geometry, material compositions, and the treatment applicator. Several researchers have investigated the implementation of MBDCAs in HDR brachytherapy for dose optimization, but moving toward using them as primary algorithms for dose calculations is still lagging. Therefore, an overview of up-to-date research is needed to familiarize clinicians with the current status of the MBDCAs for different cancers in HDR brachytherapy. In this paper, we review the MBDCAs for HDR brachytherapy from a dosimetric perspective. Treatment sites covered include breast, gynecological, lung, head and neck, esophagus, liver, prostate, and skin cancers. Moreover, we discuss the current status of implementation of MBDCAs and the challenges.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyAlgorithmsHumansMonte Carlo MethodRadiation DosageRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHDR BrachytherapyMBDCATG-43 formalismTreatment planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.