Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142186›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

A retrospective analysis of the therapeutic effects of 0.01% atropine on axial length growth in children in a real-life clinical setting.

Hakan Kaymak, Birte Graff, Frank Schaeffel, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz, Hartmut Schwahn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Myopia treatment and prophylaxis with defocus incorporated multiple segments spectacle lenses].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
    Review
  13. Atropine: Updates on myopia pharmacotherapy.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hakan KaymakInternationale Innovative Ophthalmochirurgie GbR c/o Breyer Kaymak and Klabe Augenchirurgie, Duesseldorf, Germany. dr.h.kaymak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5006-7420
Birte GraffInternationale Innovative Ophthalmochirurgie GbR c/o Breyer Kaymak and Klabe Augenchirurgie, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Frank SchaeffelSection of Neurobiology of the Eye, Ophthalmic Research Institute, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3685-0811
Achim LangenbucherInstitute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9175-6177
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Homburg, Germany.
Hartmut SchwahnInternationale Innovative Ophthalmochirurgie GbR c/o Breyer Kaymak and Klabe Augenchirurgie, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9701-8204
Internationale Innovative OphthalmochirurgieSaarland University · DEInternational Olympic Committee · CHSTZ eyetrial · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the beneficial effects of 0.01% atropine eye drops on myopia progression in children. However, treatment effects may be different in a routine clinical setting. We performed a retrospective analysis of our clinical data from children to investigate the effect of 0.01% atropine eye drops on myopia progression in a routine clinical setting.

methodsAtropine-treated children were asked to instill one drop of 0.01% atropine in each eye every evening at 5 days a week. Myopic children who did not undergo atropine treatment served as controls. Objective refraction and ocular biometry of 80 atropine-treated and 103 untreated children at initial visit and 1 year later were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsMyopic refractions in the treated and untreated children at initial visit ranged from -0.625 to -15.25 D (-4.21 ± 2.90 D) and from -0.125 to -9.375 D (-2.92 ± 1.77 D), respectively. Ages at initial visit ranged from 3.2 to 15.5 years (10.1 ± 2.7 years) in the treated and from 3.4 to 15.5 years (11.2 ± 3.0 years) in untreated children. Two-factor ANOVA for age and atropine effects on axial length growth confirmed that axial length growth rates declined with age (p<0.0001) and revealed a significant inhibitory effect of atropine on axial length growth (p<0.0015). The atropine effect on axial length growth averaged to 0.08 mm (28%) inhibition per year. Effects on refraction were not statistically significant.

conclusionThe observed atropine effects were not very distinctive: Statistical analysis confirmed that atropine reduced axial length growth, but to an extent of minor clinical relevance. It was also shown that beneficial effects of 0.01% atropine may not be obvious in each single case, which should be communicated with parents and resident ophthalmologists.

Indexed as

AtropineMydriaticsAdolescentAxial Length, EyeBiometryChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionHumansOphthalmic SolutionsRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesAtropineMydriaticsOphthalmic SolutionsAxial lengthChildrenEfficacyLow-dose atropineMyopiaMyopia control

Identifiers

PMID34142186
PMCPMC8478763
OpenAlexW3168645836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.