ReviewHerz2021
[Pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using pulsed field ablation].
Review in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Discharge Mode on the Distribution of Myocardial Pulsed Electric Field-A Simulation Study for Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia with increasing incidence and prevalence. Until now, thermal energy sources such as radiofrequency or cryoablation have been used for pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation but these have led to indiscriminate tissue destruction in the target area. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an energy modality that does not utilize thermal effects. An ultrarapid electric field produces irreversible changes in cell membrane pores (irreversible electroporation) culminating in cell death. The myocardium is very sensitive to PFA compared to the esophagus, the pulmonary veins or the phrenic nerve. Consequently, it is possible to perform effective ablation of the pulmonary veins in a very short time and to make the treatment time more effective without causing relevant collateral damage. The treatment offers a potential paradigm shift from catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34142178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.