Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142149›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular research2022

Efficacy and limitations of senolysis in atherosclerosis.

Abel Martin Garrido, Anuradha Kaistha, Anna K Uryga, Sebnem Oc, Kirsty Foote, Aarti Shah, Alison Finigan, Nichola Figg, Lina Dobnikar, Helle Jørgensen and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The right time, the right cell: the potential for precision senotherapy in pulmonary arterial hypertension.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abel Martin GarridoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Anuradha KaisthaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-1535
Anna K UrygaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-1435
Sebnem OcDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3476-3359
Kirsty FooteDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Aarti ShahDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7909-2977
Alison FiniganDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4252-9474
Nichola FiggDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Lina DobnikarNuclear Dynamics Programme, Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.
Helle JørgensenDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Martin BennettDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 110, ACCI, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-1825
University of Cambridge · GBBabraham Institute · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CH/2000003/12800British Heart Foundation PG/13/25/30014British Heart Foundation PG/14/69/31032British Heart Foundation PG/16/11/32021British Heart Foundation PG/16/24/32090British Heart Foundation PG/16/63/32307British Heart Foundation RE/18/1/34212British Heart Foundation RG/08/009/25841British Heart Foundation RG/13/14/30314British Heart Foundation RG/20/2/34763British Heart Foundation RG71070British Heart Foundation RG84554Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTraditional markers of cell senescence including p16, Lamin B1, and senescence-associated beta galactosidase (SAβG) suggest very high frequencies of senescent cells in atherosclerosis, while their removal via 'senolysis' has been reported to reduce atherogenesis. However, selective killing of a variety of different cell types can exacerbate atherosclerosis. We therefore examined the specificity of senescence markers in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and the effects of genetic or pharmacological senolysis in atherosclerosis. METHODS AND

resultsWe examined traditional senescence markers in human and mouse VSMCs in vitro, and in mouse atherosclerosis. p16 and SAβG increased and Lamin B1 decreased in replicative senescence and stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) of cultured human VSMCs. In contrast, mouse VSMCs undergoing SIPS showed only modest p16 up-regulation, and proliferating mouse monocyte/macrophages also expressed p16 and SAβG. Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) of lineage-traced mice showed increased p16 expression in VSMC-derived cells in plaques vs. normal arteries, but p16 localized to Stem cell antigen-1 (Sca1)+ or macrophage-like populations. Activation of a p16-driven suicide gene to remove p16+ vessel wall- and/or bone marrow-derived cells increased apoptotic cells, but also induced inflammation and did not change plaque size or composition. In contrast, the senolytic ABT-263 selectively reduced senescent VSMCs in culture, and markedly reduced atherogenesis. However, ABT-263 did not reduce senescence markers in vivo, and significantly reduced monocyte and platelet counts and interleukin 6 as a marker of systemic inflammation.

conclusionsWe show that genetic and pharmacological senolysis have variable effects on atherosclerosis, and may promote inflammation and non-specific effects respectively. In addition, traditional markers of cell senescence such as p16 have significant limitations to identify and remove senescent cells in atherosclerosis, suggesting that senescence studies in atherosclerosis and new senolytic drugs require more specific and lineage-restricted markers before ascribing their effects entirely to senolysis.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisPlaque, AtheroscleroticAnimalsBiomarkersCells, CulturedCellular SenescenceHumansInflammationMiceMuscle, Smooth, VascularMyocytes, Smooth MuscleSenotherapeuticsBiomarkersSenotherapeuticsAgeingAtherosclerosisCell senescence

Identifiers

PMID34142149
PMCPMC9215197
OpenAlexW3171636888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.