Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34142104›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2021

Teaching emergency ultrasound to emergency medicine residents: a scoping review of structured training methods.

Leila L PoSaw, Brandon M Wubben, Nicholas Bertucci, Gregory A Bell, Heather Healy, Sangil Lee

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Procedural case: Ultrasound Case: Syncope in PE.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Earlier point-of-care ultrasound, shorter length of stay in patients with acute flank pain.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2022
    Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leila L PoSawDivision of Emergency Medicine Jackson Memorial Hospital Miami Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9229-4883
Brandon M WubbenDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Nicholas BertucciDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Gregory A BellDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.
Heather HealyHardin Library for the Health Sciences University of Iowa Libraries Iowa City Iowa USA.
Sangil LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past 2 decades, emergency ultrasound has become essential to patient care, and is a mandated competency for emergency medicine residency graduation. However, the best evidence regarding emergency ultrasound education in residency training is not known. We performed a scoping review to determine the (1) characteristics and (2) outcomes of published structured training methods, (3) the quality of publications, and (4) the implications for research and training.

methodsWe searched broadly on multiple electronic databases and screened studies from the United States and Canada describing structured emergency ultrasound training methods for emergency medicine residents. We evaluated methodological quality with the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), and qualitatively summarized study and intervention characteristics.

resultsA total of 109 studies were selected from 6712 identified publications. Publications mainly reported 1 group pretest-posttest interventions (38%) conducted at a single institution (83%), training in image acquisition (82%) and interpretation (94%) domains with assessment of knowledge (44%) and skill (77%) outcomes, and training in cardiac (18%) or vascular access (15%) applications. Innovative strategies, such as gamification, cadaver models, and hand motion assessment are described. The MERSQI scores of 48 articles ranged from 0 to 15.5 (median, 11.5; interquartile range, 9.6-13.0) out of 18. Low scores reflected the absence of reported valid assessment tools (73%) and higher level outcomes (90%).

conclusionsAlthough innovative strategies are illustrated, the overall quality of research could be improved. The use of standardized planning and assessment tools, intentionally mapped to targeted domains and outcomes, might provide valuable formative and summative information to optimize emergency ultrasound research and training.

Indexed as

emergency medicineemergency ultrasoundgraduate medical educationscoping reviewteachingtraining

Identifiers

PMID34142104
PMCPMC8202829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.