Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141999›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2021

A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based mastery learning to teach the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma.

Siobhan Smith, Viveta Lobo, Kenton L Anderson, Michael A Gisondi, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer, Youyou Duanmu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siobhan SmithDepartment of Emergency Medicine Kaiser Permanente Redwood City California USA.
Viveta LoboDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.
Kenton L AndersonDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2761-3651
Michael A GisondiDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6800-3932
Stefanie S Sebok-SyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3572-5971
Youyou DuanmuDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3430-7866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMastery learning has gained popularity for training residents in procedural skills due to its demonstrated superiority over traditional methods. However, no studies have compared the efficacy of traditional versus mastery learning methods in residency point-of-care ultrasound education. We hypothesized that mastery learning would improve residents' skills in performing the extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (eFAST).

methodsAll first-year emergency medicine (EM) resident physicians at a single university hospital underwent a crossover randomized controlled trial to receive mastery-learning eFAST training either at the beginning of the academic year or 6 months into intern year. Participants were taught using a checklist validated by a panel of experts using Mastery Angoff methods and were given feedback on missed tasks until each trainee completed the eFAST with a minimum passing standard (MPS). Our primary outcome was technical proficiency between the two groups for eFAST examinations performed in the emergency department during the academic year.

resultsSixteen interns were enrolled; eight were randomized to each group. The group that received mastery training at the beginning of the year had mean clinical eFAST proficiency scores above the MPS in the first two quarters of the academic year, while the control group did not. Once the control group underwent eFAST mastery training at the midpoint of the year, both groups had mean proficiency scores above the MPS for the remainder of the year.

conclusionSimulation-based mastery learning is an effective method of teaching the eFAST examination. This training during intern orientation conferred early proficiency in clinical performance of eFAST among EM residents. This difference in proficiency was no longer present after the control group received mastery learning education halfway through the academic year.

Indexed as

extended focused assessment with sonography in traumamastery learningpoint‐of‐care ultrasoundresidency education

Identifiers

PMID34141999
PMCPMC8190510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.