Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141897›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2021

A technique for parallel query optimization using MapReduce framework and a semantic-based clustering method.

Elham Azhir, Nima Jafari Navimipour, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Arash Sharifi, Aso Darwesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elham AzhirDepartment of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Nima Jafari NavimipourFuture Technology Research Center, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Douliou, Yunlin, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Mehdi HosseinzadehPattern Recognition and Machine Learning Lab, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Sujeonggu, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Arash SharifiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Aso DarweshDepartment of Information Technology, University of Human Development, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Query optimization is the process of identifying the best Query Execution Plan (QEP). The query optimizer produces a close to optimal QEP for the given queries based on the minimum resource usage. The problem is that for a given query, there are plenty of different equivalent execution plans, each with a corresponding execution cost. To produce an effective query plan thus requires examining a large number of alternative plans. Access plan recommendation is an alternative technique to database query optimization, which reuses the previously-generated QEPs to execute new queries. In this technique, the query optimizer uses clustering methods to identify groups of similar queries. However, clustering such large datasets is challenging for traditional clustering algorithms due to huge processing time. Numerous cloud-based platforms have been introduced that offer low-cost solutions for the processing of distributed queries such as Hadoop, Hive, Pig, etc. This paper has applied and tested a model for clustering variant sizes of large query datasets parallelly using MapReduce. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the parallel implementation of query workloads clustering to achieve good scalability.

Indexed as

Access plan recommendationCluster computingDBSCAN AlgorithmMapReduceParallel ProcessingQuery optimization

Identifiers

PMID34141897
PMCPMC8176525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.