ReviewRegenerative therapy2021
Three dimensional printed nanostructure biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering Biomimetic 3D Microenvironments for Extracellular Vesicle Programming Toward Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Autonomous Implants.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Current State of Knowledge Regarding the Treatment of Cranial Bone Defects: An Overview.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biomaterials for Guided Tissue Regeneration and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Optimizations of Placenta Extracellular Matrix-Loaded Silk Fibroin/Alginate 3D-Printed Scaffolds Structurally and Functionally for Bone Tissue Engineering.Engineering in life sciences · 2025Article
- Novel approach for biomaterial assessment: utilizing the Ex Ovo quail cam assay for biocompatibility pre-screening.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Shape Memory Polymer Bioglass Composite Scaffolds Designed to Heal Complex Bone Defects.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- 3D printed polycaprolactone/gelatin/ordered mesoporous calcium magnesium silicate nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue regeneration.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024Article
- Smurf1-targeting microRNA-136-5p-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combined with 3D-printed β-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds strengthen osteogenic activity and alleviate bone defects.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Curcumin-loaded scaffolds in bone regeneration.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Nanostructured Biomaterials in 3D Tumor Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Regenerative Medicine and Immunotherapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Advances in Biomimetic Scaffolds for Hard Tissue Surgery.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- 3D printing technology and its combination with nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- A xonotlite nanofiber bioactive 3D-printed hydrogel scaffold based on osteo-/angiogenesis and osteoimmune microenvironment remodeling accelerates vascularized bone regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Fabrication and characterization of 3D-printed composite scaffolds of coral-derived hydroxyapatite nanoparticles/polycaprolactone/gelatin carrying doxorubicin for bone tissue engineering.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2024Article
- Current developments and future perspectives of nanotechnology in orthopedic implants: an updated review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- 3D printed drug loaded nanomaterials for wound healing applications.Regenerative therapy · 2023Review
- Advancing Dentistry through Bioprinting: Personalization of Oral Tissues.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Recent Progress in Hyaluronic-Acid-Based Hydrogels for Bone Tissue Engineering.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Updates on Biogenic Metallic and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: Therapy, Drug Delivery and Cytotoxicity.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The suffering from organ dysfunction due to damaged or diseased tissue/bone has been globally on the rise. Current treatment strategies for non-union bone defects include: the use of autografts, allografts, synthetic grafts and free vascularized fibular grafts. Bone tissue engineering has emerged as an alternative for fracture repair to satisfy the current unmet need of bone grafts and to alleviate the problems associated with autografts and allografts. The technology offers the possibility to induce new functional bone regeneration using synergistic combination of functional biomaterials (scaffolds), cells, and growth factors. Bone scaffolds are typically made of porous biodegradable materials that provide the mechanical support during repair and regeneration of damaged or diseased bone. Significant progress has been made towards scaffold materials for structural support, desired osteogenesis and angiogenesis abilities. Thanks for innovative scaffolds fabrication technologies, bioresorbable scaffolds with controlled porosity and tailored properties are possible today. Despite the presence of different bone scaffold fabrication methods, pore size, shape and interconnectivity have not yet been fully controlled in most of the methods. Moreover, scaffolds with tailored porosity for specific defects are still difficult to manufacture. Nevertheless, such scaffolds can be designed and fabricated using three dimensional (3D) printing approaches. 3D printing technology, as an advanced tissue scaffold fabrication method, offers the opportunity to produce complex geometries with distinct advantages. The technology has been used for the production of various types of bodily constructs such as blood vessels, vascular networks, bones, cartilages, exoskeletons, eyeglasses, cell cultures, tissues, organs and novel drug delivery devices. This review focuses on 3D printed scaffolds and their application in bone repair and regeneration. In addition, different classes of biomaterials commonly employed for the fabrication of 3D nano scaffolds for bone tissue engineering application so far are briefly discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.