Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141818›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Effect of Inadequate Empiric Antibacterial Therapy on Hospital Outcomes in SARS-CoV-2-Positive and -Negative US Patients With a Positive Bacterial Culture: A Multicenter Evaluation From March to November 2020.

Laura Puzniak, Karri A Bauer, Kalvin C Yu, Pamela Moise, Lyn Finelli, Gang Ye, Carisa De Anda, Latha Vankeepuram, Vikas Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Treatment and Management ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Review
  6. Molecular Typing and Resistance Profile ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. To Prescribe, or Not to Prescribe, That Is the Question.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura PuzniakMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-9683
Karri A BauerMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Kalvin C YuBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA.
Pamela MoiseMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Lyn FinelliMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Gang YeBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA.
Carisa De AndaMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Latha VankeepuramBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA.
Vikas GuptaBecton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreased utilization of antimicrobial therapy has been observed during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We evaluated hospital outcomes based on the adequacy of antibacterial therapy for bacterial pathogens in US patients.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective study included patients with ≥24 hours of inpatient admission, ≥24 hours of antibiotic therapy, and discharge/death from March to November 2020 at 201 US hospitals in the BD Insights Research Database. Included patients had a test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and a positive bacterial culture (gram-positive or gram-negative). We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate the impact of inadequate empiric therapy (IET), defined as therapy not active against the identified bacteria or no antimicrobial therapy in the 48 hours following culture, on in-hospital mortality and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay (LOS).

resultsOf 438 888 SARS-CoV-2-tested patients, 39 203 (8.9%) had positive bacterial cultures. Among patients with positive cultures, 9.4% were SARS-CoV-2 positive, 74.4% had a gram-negative pathogen, 25.6% had a gram-positive pathogen, and 44.1% received IET for the bacterial infection. The odds of mortality were 21% higher for IET (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.10-1.33;

conclusionsBacterial pathogens continue to play an important role in hospital outcomes during the pandemic. Adequate and timely therapeutic management may help ensure better outcomes.

Indexed as

adequate therapyantimicrobialsbacteriaCOVID-19empiric therapySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34141818
PMCPMC8204877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.