Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141775›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2021

Health-related quality of life after gastric cancer treatment in Brazil: Narrative review and reflections.

Rodrigo Nascimento Pinheiro, Samantha Mucci, Renato Morato Zanatto, Olavo Magalhães Picanço Junior, Alexandre Ferreira Oliveira, Gaspar de Jesus Lopes Filho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rodrigo Nascimento PinheiroSurgical Oncology Service, Surgical Oncology Residency and Academic League of Oncology, Federal District Base Hospital, Brasília 70330-150, Distrito Federal, Brazil. rodrigo@cancerdf.com.br.
Samantha MucciDepartment of Psychiatry, Federal University of São Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine (UNIFESP-EPM), São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato Morato ZanattoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Amaral Carvalho Cancer Hospital, Jaú 17210-070, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olavo Magalhães Picanço JuniorDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá 68900-073, Amapá, Brazil.
Alexandre Ferreira OliveiraDepartment of Surgery, Juiz de Fora Federal University, Juiz de Fora 36036-110, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Gaspar de Jesus Lopes FilhoPostgraduate Program in Interdisciplinary Surgical Science, Federal University of São Paulo, Paulista School of Medicine (UNIFESP-EPM), São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brazil, gastric cancer is the third most common type of cancer among men and fifth among women, with an estimated 13360 new cases among men and 7870 among women each year during the 2020-2022 period. This study presents reflections and attempts to add knowledge to the theme of quality of life (QoL) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and describes some of its characteristics in three regions of Brazil, with an evaluation of the disease's impacts in various dimensions of life, as reported by the patients themselves. We performed a narrative review of the literature and a data analysis of studies on QoL in Brazilian patients treated for gastric adenocarcinoma from three different cities in three geographic regions: Brasília (the midwest), Jaú (the southeast), and Macapá (the north).

Indexed as

GastrectomyGastric cancerGastric neoplasmsQuality of lifeStomach cancerStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34141775
PMCPMC8173417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.