ArticleHip & pelvis2021
Patient-specific Three-dimensional Bone Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Orthopedic Diseases of the Hip: Opinions of Orthopedic Surgeons on New Medical Technology.
Article in Hip & pelvis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of 3-dimensional printing implants for bone tumors.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo examine the perceptions and opinions of orthopedic surgeons on new medical technology for patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) bone models in the diagnosis and treatment of orthopedic diseases related to the hip joint. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 75 doctors who were trained in orthopedic surgery or were current residents in the Republic of Korea were surveyed via questionnaires. Eight questions were included regarding the utility and current issues in the diagnosis and treatment of orthopedic disease using a customized 3D bone model made from s patient's computed tomography (CT) image. In addition to the questionnaire, the simple plain radiography and 3D CT image of the patient and 3D printed models of two actual patients were presented for comparison.
resultsAn average of 92.7% of the orthopedic surgeons answered "very much" or "yes" to questions regarding the effectiveness of diagnosis, treatment, education, and simulation of surgery using the patient-specific 3D bone model. To the question, "Do you think you must have medical insurance to provide better medical services by using a new patient-specific 3D bone model medical technology for simulated surgery?" 93.3% of orthopedic surgeons answered either "very much" or "yes".
conclusionPatient-specific 3D bone models of new medical technology can provide breakthrough support in the diagnosis, treatment, and education of orthopedic diseases in the field of hip joints. Therefore, it seems that efforts should be made to change governmental policy for coverage of patient-specific 3D bone modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.