ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2021
Three dimensional CT analysis of the change in rotational alignment in double level osteotomy after double level osteotomy performed for varus osteoarthritic knees.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the change in rotational alignment caused by double level osteotomy (DLO) based on comparative three-dimensional image analysis of pre- and postoperative CT images.
methodsPre- and postoperative CT examination of the lower extremities were performed with informed consent for 39 consecutive knees undergoing DLO for varus knee deformity. The DLO procedure consisted of closed wedge distal femoral osteotomy (CWDFO) and open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). Among those cases, 20 knees complicated with hinge fracture at the osteotomy site were excluded from the analysis to eliminate a confounding factor affecting the results. Consequently, data obtained from 19 knees were subjected to the study analysis while osteotomies with hinge fractures complications were excluded from the study. In the three-dimensional CT image analysis of axial plane images, femoral torsion (the angle between midline along the femoral neck axis and the tangent of the posterior edges of the medial/lateral femoral condyles) and tibial torsion (the angle between the tangent of the posterior edges of the medial/lateral tibial condyles and the transmalleolar axis) were measured. The torsion angle was measured in each of the femurs and the tibias on both pre- and postoperative CT axial images, and the change induced by the osteotomy was calculated and statistically(using Wilcoxon signed-rank test) compared.
resultsThe mean pre- and postoperative femoral torsion (anteversion) angles were 29.3° and 31.4° with a significant postoperative increase in internal rotation of the bony segment distal to the osteotomy(P = 0.002). On the tibial side, the mean pre- and postoperative torsion angles were 26.5° and 25.7°, indicating no significant postoperative change(P = 0.199)（NS）.
conclusionsThis study showed that the DLO procedure (combining CWDFO and OWHTO) increased torsion (anteversion) of the femur by 2.1° on average while inducing no significant rotational change on the tibial side.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.