ArticlePhotoacoustics2021
Classification and discrimination of real and fake blood based on photoacoustic spectroscopy combined with particle swarm optimized wavelet neural networks.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dynamic modeling of photoacoustic sensor data to classify human blood samples.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- The Effect of Law Students in Entrepreneurial Psychology Under the Artificial Intelligence Technology.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, photoacoustic spectroscopy was employed to distinguish real blood from fake blood rapidly, accurately, and recoverably. To achieve this goal, a photoacoustic detection system for blood was established in the forward mode. In the experiments, four kinds of animal blood and two kinds of fake blood in a total of 150 groups were used. The time-resolved photoacoustic signal and peak-to-peak values (PPVs) of all blood were captured in 700-1064 nm with intervals of 5 nm. Experimental results show that the amplitudes, profiles, peak-point time, and PPVs are different between real and fake blood. Although the PPVs of real blood are larger than those of the fake ones at 700-850 nm, the differences in PPVs are not obvious at 850-1064 nm, especially when there are spectral overlaps of PPVs. To accurately classify and discriminate real and fake blood, a wavelet neural network (WNN) was used to train 120 groups of blood and test 30 groups of blood. Moreover, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm was used to optimize the weights and thresholds, as well as the translation and scale factors of the Morlet-liked wavelet basis function of the WNN. Under optimal parameters, the correct rate of the WNN-PSO algorithm was improved from 63.3% to 96.7%. Next, principal component analysis (PCA) was combined into the WNN-PSO algorithm to further improve the correct rate. The results indicate that the correct rate of the PCA-WNN-PSO algorithm with 10 principal components reaches 100 %. Therefore, photoacoustic spectroscopy combined with the PCA-WNN-PSO algorithm exhibits excellent performance in the classification and discrimination of real and fake blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.