Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141448›Full record

ReviewVirus evolution2021

Evolutionary history of cotranscriptional editing in the paramyxoviral phosphoprotein gene.

Jordan Douglas, Alexei J Drummond, Richard L Kingston

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virus evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The RNA Revolution in the Central Molecular Biology Dogma Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomolecules · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experimental Evidence of Intrinsic Disorder and Amyloid Formation by theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordan DouglasCentre for Computational Evolution, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-9961
Alexei J DrummondCentre for Computational Evolution, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.
Richard L KingstonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0893-6973
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phosphoprotein gene of the paramyxoviruses encodes multiple protein products. The P, V, and W proteins are generated by transcriptional slippage. This process results in the insertion of non-templated guanosine nucleosides into the mRNA at a conserved edit site. The P protein is an essential component of the viral RNA polymerase and is encoded by a faithful copy of the gene in the majority of paramyxoviruses. However, in some cases, the non-essential V protein is encoded by default and guanosines must be inserted into the mRNA in order to encode P. The number of guanosines inserted into the P gene can be described by a probability distribution, which varies between viruses. In this article, we review the nature of these distributions, which can be inferred from mRNA sequencing data, and reconstruct the evolutionary history of cotranscriptional editing in the paramyxovirus family. Our model suggests that, throughout known history of the family, the system has switched from a P default to a V default mode four times; complete loss of the editing system has occurred twice, the canonical zinc finger domain of the V protein has been deleted or heavily mutated a further two times, and the W protein has independently evolved a novel function three times. Finally, we review the physical mechanisms of cotranscriptional editing via slippage of the viral RNA polymerase.

Indexed as

cotranscriptional editingparamyxovirusphylogeneticsreviewslippagestuttering

Identifiers

PMID34141448
PMCPMC8204654
OpenAlexW3150490488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.