Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141309›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of developmental disabilities2017

Massage efficacy in the treatment of autistic children - a literature review.

Robert Walaszek, Natalia Maśnik, Anna Marszałek, Katarzyna Walaszek, Marcin Burdacki

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of developmental disabilities, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert WalaszekDepartment of Biological Regeneration of the University of Physical Education, Cracow, Poland.
Natalia MaśnikStudio Body Aesthetics, Cracow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4009-6401
Anna MarszałekPublic Elementary School of Friends of Catholic Schools Association in Hucisko-Pawelka, Hucisko, Poland.
Katarzyna WalaszekDepartment of Rehabilitation of the University of Physical Education, Cracow, Poland.
Marcin BurdackiDepartment of Rehabilitation of the University of Physical Education, Cracow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism is one of the most serious contemporary medical problems. The causes of this disorder remain unknown however there are many hypotheses on the development of this specific symptom constellation. Autistic children have difficulties with contact establishment, they do not like to be touched and do not react to the external stimuli. Studies show that emotional, social, and cognitive development of an autistic child depends to a large extent on his/her early tactile experiences. Therefore it seems that effective treatment methods should be sought in this area. These methods include various tactile therapies, predominantly massages. The purpose of a massage is to induce physiological reactions in the body that have preventive, therapeutic, and relaxing effects. The purpose of this work was to present selected massage forms as supportive rehabilitation methods of autistic children. Massage forms were selected that show high effectiveness in relieving autism symptoms. The results of clinical studies by various authors prove that massages reduce child's anxiety, improve social communication, and favor formation of closeness and bonds with the parents thus bringing the prospects for better development of the child.

Indexed as

autismchild developmentmassagetherapy

Identifiers

PMID34141309
PMCPMC8115532
OpenAlexW2601638790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.