Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141277›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Does stress mess with rodents' heads? Influence of habitat amount and genetic factors in mandible fluctuating asymmetry in South American water rats (

Aldo Caccavo, Hudson Lemos, Luana S Maroja, Pablo Rodrigues Gonçalves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Does the primate face cue personality?Personality neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aldo CaccavoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Conservação PPGCiAC - Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Macaé Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-1573
Hudson LemosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Conservação PPGCiAC - Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Macaé Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-4312
Luana S MarojaDepartment of Biology Williams College Williamstown MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7287-9435
Pablo Rodrigues GonçalvesInstituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade NUPEM Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Macaé Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4923-2334
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Estadual do Ceará · BRWilliams College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of developmental stability can lead to deviations from bilateral symmetry (i.e. Fluctuating Asymmetry - FA), and is thought to be caused by environmental and genetic factors associated with habitat loss and stress. Therefore, levels of FA might be a valuable tool to monitor wild populations if FA serves as an indicator of exposure to stress due to impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation. In studies examining FA and habitat fragmentation, FA levels are often explained by loss of genetic variation, though few studies have addressed FA's use as indicator of environmental impact. Here, we investigated whether habitat loss, genetic variation, and/or inbreeding affect the developmental instability in Brazilian Atlantic forest populations of a Neotropical water rat (

Indexed as

developmental changeshabitat availabilityhuman impactsrodents

Identifiers

PMID34141277
PMCPMC8207160
OpenAlexW3159744149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.