Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141237›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Valley-scale hydrogeomorphology drives river fish assemblage variation in Mongolia.

Alain Maasri, Mark Pyron, Emily R Arsenault, James H Thorp, Bud Mendsaikhan, Flavia Tromboni, Mario Minder, Scott J Kenner, John Costello, Sudeep Chandra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alain MaasriDepartment of Ecosystem Research Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1236-8374
Mark PyronDepartment of Biology Ball State University Muncie IN USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0451-7827
Emily R ArsenaultKansas Biological Survey and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA.
James H ThorpKansas Biological Survey and the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA.
Bud MendsaikhanInstitute of Geography and Geoecology Mongolian Academy of Sciences Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.
Flavia TromboniGlobal Water Center and Department of Biology University of Nevada Reno NV USA.
Mario MinderDepartment of Biology Ball State University Muncie IN USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1391-6945
Scott J KennerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering South Dakota School of Mines & Technology Rapid City SD USA.
John CostelloDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering South Dakota School of Mines & Technology Rapid City SD USA.
Sudeep ChandraGlobal Water Center and Department of Biology University of Nevada Reno NV USA.
Amarbat OtgonganbatDepartment of Biology National University of Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.
Bazartseren BoldgivThe Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University Philadelphia PA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

River hydrogeomorphology is a major driver shaping biodiversity and community composition. Here, we examine how hydrogeomorphic heterogeneity expressed by Functional Process Zones (FPZs) in river networks is associated with fish assemblage variation. We examined this association in two distinct ecoregions in Mongolia expected to display different gradients of river network hydrogeomorphic heterogeneity. We delineated FPZs by extracting valley-scale hydrogeomorphic variables at 10 km sample intervals in forest steppe (FS) and in grassland (G) river networks. We sampled fish assemblages and examined variation associated with changes in gradients of hydrogeomorphology as expressed by the FPZs. Thus, we examined assemblage variation as patterns of occurrence- and abundance-based beta diversities for the taxonomic composition of assemblages and as functional beta diversity. Overall, we delineated 5 and 6 FPZs in river networks of the FS and G, respectively. Eight fish species were found in the FS river network and seventeen in the G, four of them common to both ecoregions. Functional richness was correspondingly higher in the G river network. Variation in the taxonomic composition of assemblages was driven by species turnover and was only significant in the G river network. Abundance-based taxonomic variation was significant in river networks of both ecoregions, while the functional beta diversity results were inconclusive. We show that valley-scale hydrogeomorphology is a significant driver of variation in fish assemblages at a macrosystem scale. Both changes in the composition of fish assemblages and the carrying capacity of the river network were driven by valley-scale hydrogeomorphic variables. River network hydrogeomorphology as accounted for in the study has, therefore, the potential to inform macrosystem scale community ecology research and conservation efforts.

Indexed as

beta diversityecoregional differencesfish biodiversityfunctional process zonesmacrosystem ecologyriverine ecosystem synthesis

Identifiers

PMID34141237
PMCPMC8207391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.