Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141211›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

The impact of aquaculture on the genetics and distribution of the onuphid annelid

Matthew P Galaska, David S Wethey, Andrés Arias, Stanislas F Dubois, Kenneth M Halanych, Sarah A Woodin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Review ofBiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Matthew P GalaskaCooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, & Ecosystem Studies NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Lab University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4257-0170
David S WetheyDepartment of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-1606
Andrés AriasDepartamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Zoología) Universidad de Oviedo Oviedo Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-7204
Stanislas F DuboisIFREMER - DYNECO LEBCO Plouzané France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3326-4892
Kenneth M HalanychDepartment of Biological Sciences Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8658-9674
Sarah A WoodinDepartment of Biological Sciences University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5615-2212
University of South Carolina · USIfremer · FRInstitute of Wood Science and Technology · INUniversidad de Oviedo · ESUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimEvolutionary history of natural populations can be confounded by human intervention such as the case of decorator worm species LOCATION: Northeastern Atlantic, the Bay of Biscay, and the Normanno-Breton Gulf.

methodsWe utilized a RAD-tag-based SNP approach to create a reduced genomic data set to recover fine-scale population structure and infer which hypothesis best describes the

resultsClustering analyses were consistent with MAIN

conclusionsThese results are congruent with previous simulations that did not support connectivity from the Bay of Biscay to the Normanno-Breton Gulf by natural dispersal. These genomic findings, with support from previous climatic studies, further support the hypothesis that

Indexed as

Bay of BiscayConvex HullOnuphidaephylogeographypopulation geneticsRADseq

Identifiers

PMID34141211
PMCPMC8207402
OpenAlexW3157337197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.