Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141193›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Social networks based on frequency of roost cohabitation do not reflect association rates of

Austin G Waag, John J Treanor, Jess N Kropczynski, Joseph S Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Austin G WaagDepartment of Biological Sciences Ohio University Athens OH USA.
John J TreanorUnited States National Park Service Yellowstone National Park Mammoth Hot Springs WY USA.
Jess N KropczynskiSchool of Information Technology The University of Cincinnati Cincinnati OH USA.
Joseph S JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences Ohio University Athens OH USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2555-8142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats are a group of mammals well known for forming dynamic social groups. Studies of bat social structures are often based upon the frequency at which bats occupy the same roosts because observing bats directly is not always possible. However, it is not always clear how closely bats occupying the same roost associate with each other, obscuring whether associations result from social relationships or factors such as shared preferences for roosts. Our goal was to determine if bats cohabitating buildings were also found together inside roosts by using anti-collision technology for PIT tags, which enables simultaneous detection of multiple tags. We PIT-tagged 293 female little brown myotis (

Indexed as

association indexhigh‐frequency RFIDlittle brown batpassive integrated transponderradio‐frequency identificationsocial network analysisYellowstone National Park

Identifiers

PMID34141193
PMCPMC8207371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.