ArticleEcology and evolution2021
When are hypotheses useful in ecology and evolution?
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thinking Outside the Black Box: Seven Guidelines for GenAI Use in the Ecological Sciences.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- A combination of environmental and landscape variables drives movement and habitat use in two Anaxyrus toads.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- Research Hypothesis: A Brief History, Central Role in Scientific Inquiry, and Characteristics.Addiction & health · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of metabolic rate between two genetically distinct populations of lake sturgeon.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
- Tissue-specific transcriptomes reveal potential mechanisms of microbiome heterogeneity in an ancient fish.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- On the scope of scientific hypotheses.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Prey selection along a predators' body size gradient evidences the role of different trait-based mechanisms in food web organization.PloS one · 2023Article
- Phylogeographic dynamics of the arthropod vector, the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis).Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Giving science the finger-is the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) a biomarker of good luck? A cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Fine scale prediction of ecological community composition using a two-step sequential Machine Learning ensemble.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- The early bird gets the return: The benefits of publishing your data sooner.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- When are hypotheses useful in ecology and evolution?Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research hypotheses have been a cornerstone of science since before Galileo. Many have argued that hypotheses (1) encourage discovery of mechanisms, and (2) reduce bias-both features that should increase transferability and reproducibility. However, we are entering a new era of big data and highly predictive models where some argue the hypothesis is outmoded. We hypothesized that hypothesis use has declined in ecology and evolution since the 1990s, given the substantial advancement of tools further facilitating descriptive, correlative research. Alternatively, hypothesis use may have become
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.