ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2021
A comparative study of multiple instance learning methods for cancer detection using T-cell receptor sequences.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Naïve adaptive immune receptor repertoires in celiac disease assessed by machine learning; impact of the HLA-DQ2.5 allotype on the TCR repertoire.Immunogenetics · 2026Article
- Deciphering small sequence differences in T cell receptor-antigen pairing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- A Variational Bayesian Approach for Multimodal Multi-instance Classification.Pattern recognition · 2026Article
- Pathological diagnosis of thyroid nodules directly from ultrasonography by a weakly supervised deep learning framework.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Multi-instance Learner Decodes Cellular Recruitment from Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based prediction of autoimmune diseases.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AutoTFCNNY: A multi-instance neural network for enhanced early cancer detection using TCR data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Mapping cellular interactions from spatially resolved transcriptomics data.Nature methods · 2024Article
- Variable Selection in Bayesian Multiple Instance Regression using Shotgun Stochastic Search.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2024Article
- BertTCR: a Bert-based deep learning framework for predicting cancer-related immune status based on T cell receptor repertoire.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Model-Agnostic Binary Patch Grouping for Bone Marrow Whole Slide Image Representation.The American journal of pathology · 2024Article
- DeepLION2: deep multi-instance contrastive learning framework enhancing the prediction of cancer-associated T cell receptors by attention strategy on motifs.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Multiple instance learning to predict immune checkpoint blockade efficacy using neoantigen candidates.iScience · 2023Article
- Attention-Based Deep Learning System for Classification of Breast Lesions-Multimodal, Weakly Supervised Approach.Cancers · 2023Article
- Multiple instance neural networks based on sparse attention for cancer detection using T-cell receptor sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Challenges in translational machine learning.Human genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a branch of machine learning, multiple instance learning (MIL) learns from a collection of labeled bags, each containing a set of instances. The learning process is weakly supervised due to ambiguous instance labels. Since its emergence, MIL has been applied to solve various problems including content-based image retrieval, object tracking/detection, and computer-aided diagnosis. In biomedical research, the use of MIL has been focused on medical image analysis and molecule activity prediction. We review and apply 16 methods to investigate the applicability of MIL to a novel biomedical application, cancer detection using T-cell receptor (TCR) sequences. This important application can be a viable approach for large-scale cancer screening, as TCRs can be easily profiled from a subject's peripheral blood. We consider two feasible data-generating mechanisms, and for the purpose of performance evaluation, we simulate data under each mechanism, where we vary potentially important factors to mimic realistic situations. We also apply the methods to sequencing data of ten cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, as an early proof of concept for distinguishing tumor patients from healthy individuals via TCR sequencing of peripheral blood. We find that given an appropriate MIL method is used, satisfactory performance with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve above 80% can be achieved for five in the ten cancers. Based on our numerical results, we make suggestions about selection of a proper method and avoidance of any method with poor performance. We further point out directions of future research as well as identify a pressing need of new MIL methodologies for improved performance (for some cancer types) and more explainable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.