Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34141016›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2021

Postimplantation pocket hematoma increases risk of cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A meta-analysis.

Jakrin Kewcharoen, Chanavuth Kanitsoraphan, Sittinun Thangjui, Thiratest Leesutipornchai, Sakditad Saowapa, Apichai Pokawattana, Leenhapong Navaravong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical skill simulation training to proficiency reduces procedural errors among novice cardiac device implanters: a randomized study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jakrin KewcharoenUniversity of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program Honolulu HI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0959-5576
Chanavuth KanitsoraphanUniversity of Hawaii Internal Medicine Residency Program Honolulu HI USA.
Sittinun ThangjuiFaculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University Hospital Bangkok Thailand.
Thiratest LeesutipornchaiFaculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn University Hospital Bangkok Thailand.
Sakditad SaowapaFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University Bangkok Thailand.
Apichai PokawattanaDivision of Cardiology Rajavithi Hospital Bangkok Thailand.
Leenhapong NavaravongDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-1707
Chulalongkorn University · THUniversity of Hawaii System · USMahidol University · THRajavithi Hospital · THUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral studies have shown an inconsistent relationship between postimplantation pocket hematoma and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effect of postimplantation hematoma and the risk of CIED infection.

methodsWe searched the databases of MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to March 2020. Included studies were cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and randomized controlled trials that reported incidence of postimplantation pocket hematoma and CIED infection during the follow-up period. CIED infection was defined as either a device-related local or systemic infection. Data from each study were combined using the random effects, generic inverse variance method of Der Simonian and Laird to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsFourteen studies were included in final analysis, involving a total of 28 319 participants. In random-effect model, we found that postimplantation pocket hematoma significantly increases the risk of overall CIED infection (OR = 6.30, 95% CI: 3.87-10.24,

conclusionsOur meta-analysis demonstrated that postimplantation pocket hematoma significantly increases the risk of CIED infection. Precaution should be taken during device implantation to reduce postimplantation hematoma and subsequent CIED infection.

Indexed as

cardiac implantable electronic devicecardiac implantable electronic device infectionhematoma

Identifiers

PMID34141016
PMCPMC8207394
OpenAlexW3136774470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.