Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34140918›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Reducing Generalization of Conditioned Fear: Beneficial Impact of Fear Relevance and Feedback in Discrimination Training.

Katharina Herzog, Marta Andreatta, Kristina Schneider, Miriam A Schiele, Katharina Domschke, Marcel Romanos, Jürgen Deckert, Paul Pauli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Generalized expectancy of threat in threatening compared to safe contexts.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina HerzogDepartment of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Marta AndreattaDepartment of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Kristina SchneiderDepartment of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Miriam A SchieleDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Katharina DomschkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marcel RomanosDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, Würzburg, Germany.
Jürgen DeckertDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Center of Mental Health, Würzburg, Germany.
Paul PauliDepartment of Psychology (Biological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Psychotherapy), Center of Mental Health, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
University of Würzburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety patients over-generalize fear, possibly because of an incapacity to discriminate threat and safety signals. Discrimination trainings are promising approaches for reducing such fear over-generalization. Here we investigated the efficacy of a fear-relevant vs. a fear-irrelevant discrimination training on fear generalization and whether the effects are increased with feedback during training. Eighty participants underwent two fear acquisition blocks, during which one face (conditioned stimulus, CS+), but not another face (CS-), was associated with a female scream (unconditioned stimulus, US). During two generalization blocks, both CSs plus four morphs (generalization stimuli, GS1-GS4) were presented. Between these generalization blocks, half of the participants underwent a fear-relevant discrimination training (discrimination between CS+ and the other faces) with or without feedback and the other half a fear-irrelevant discrimination training (discrimination between the width of lines) with or without feedback. US expectancy, arousal, valence ratings, and skin conductance responses (SCR) indicated successful fear acquisition. Importantly, fear-relevant vs. fear-irrelevant discrimination trainings and feedback vs. no feedback reduced generalization as reflected in US expectancy ratings independently from one another. No effects of training condition were found for arousal and valence ratings or SCR. In summary, this is a first indication that fear-relevant discrimination training and feedback can improve the discrimination between threat and safety signals in healthy individuals, at least for learning-related evaluations, but not evaluations of valence or (physiological) arousal.

Indexed as

classical conditioningdiscrimination trainingfear generalizationfear-relevant trainingfeedback

Identifiers

PMID34140918
PMCPMC8203828
OpenAlexW3169184910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.