Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34140861›Full record

ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2021

Rationale of indications for caesarean delivery and associated factors among primigravidae in Tanzania.

Juliana C Mpotora, James J Yahaya, Secilia K Ngw'eshemi, Ipyana H Mwampagatwa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana C MpotoraDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health Science (CHS), The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
James J YahayaDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Health Science (CHS), The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Secilia K Ngw'eshemiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science (CHS), The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Ipyana H MwampagatwaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Science (CHS), The University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
The University of Dodoma · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of modes of delivery and associated maternal and newborn outcomes among singleton primigravidae in the Iringa region of Tanzania.

methodsA cross-sectional, analytical hospital-based study was conducted in the Iringa region among 356 singleton primigravidae between April and August 2018. Convenience sampling and consecutive collection of data using a face-to-face interviewer-administered questionnaire was done.

resultsA total of 356 singleton primigravid women with a mean age of 22.0 years (range: 15-49) participated in the study. The majority of the participants (73.0%, n = 250) were in the 20-35 age group. Caesarean and vaginal delivery were performed in 41.3% (n = 147) and 58.7% (n = 209) of the cases, respectively. The maternal height and weight of the newborn were significantly associated with caesarean delivery; (

conclusionsThe findings of our study indicated the prevalence of caesarean section to be three times more than that recommended by the World Health Organization. Pregnant women with a height of less than 150 cm should be considered for caesarean section. Therefore, it is necessary for stakeholders in the health sector to formulate guidelines for absolute indications for caesarean section.

Indexed as

Caesarean sectionDeliveryMaternalNeonatesOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID34140861
PMCPMC8178681
OpenAlexW3130901898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.