Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34140668›Full record

ArticleNature plants2021

Somatic variations led to the selection of acidic and acidless orange cultivars.

Lun Wang, Yue Huang, ZiAng Liu, Jiaxian He, Xiaolin Jiang, Fa He, Zhihao Lu, Shuizhi Yang, Peng Chen, Huiwen Yu and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Layer-specific genetic variation unlocks secondary metabolite diversity in long-lived clonal peppermint.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. The gene-like promoter and transcription of LTR retrotransposons.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lun Wang *Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Yue Huang *Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
ZiAng Liu *Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Jiaxian HeKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Xiaolin JiangKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Fa HeKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Zhihao LuKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Shuizhi YangHorticulture Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, P. R. China.
Peng ChenHorticulture Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, P. R. China.
Huiwen YuKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Bin ZengHorticulture Institute, Hunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changsha, P. R. China.
Lingjun KeKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Zongzhou XieKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Robert M LarkinKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Dong JiangCitrus Research Institute, Southwest University, Chongqing, P. R. China.
Ray MingDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9417-5789
Edward S BucklerAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3100-371X
Xiuxin DengKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4490-4514
Qiang XuKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, P. R. China. xuqiang@mail.hzau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1786-9696
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNHunan Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAgricultural Research Service · USSouthwest University · CNUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic variations are a major source of genetic diversification in asexual plants, and underpin clonal evolution and the breeding of asexual crops. Sweet orange is a model species for studying somatic variation because it reproduces asexually through apomixis and is propagated asexually through grafting. To dissect the genomic basis of somatic variation, we de novo assembled a reference genome of sweet orange with an average of three gaps per chromosome and a N50 contig of 24.2 Mb, as well as six diploid genomes of somatic mutants of sweet oranges. We then sequenced 114 somatic mutants with an average genome coverage of 41×. Categorization of the somatic variations yielded insights into the single-nucleotide somatic mutations, structural variations and transposable element (TE) transpositions. We detected 877 TE insertions, and found TE insertions in the transporter or its regulatory genes associated with variation in fruit acidity. Comparative genomic analysis of sweet oranges from three diversity centres supported a dispersal from South China to the Mediterranean region and to the Americas. This study provides a global view on the somatic variations, the diversification and dispersal history of sweet orange and a set of candidate genes that will be useful for improving fruit taste and flavour.

Indexed as

Genes, PlantAcidsChinaCitrus sinensisFruitGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenotypeMutationPlant BreedingAcids

Identifiers

PMID34140668
OpenAlexW3167957238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.