ArticleNature communications2021
Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector.
Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-power hybrid commutated converter for carbon-neutral power transmission.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Large-Scale Carbon Removal Will Create Public Health, Economic, and Climate Trade-Offs.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Decomposing sources of value for electricity and negative emissions technologies in net-zero power systems.iScience · 2026Article
- Policy Portfolio Options for Encouraging Deployment of Negative Emissions Technologies in the Electricity System.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Chemistry advances driving industrial carbon capture technologies.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
- Status and Outlook of Solid Oxide Cells for Hydrocarbon Fuel Conversion.ChemSusChem · 2025Review
- Repositioning coal power to accelerate net-zero transition of China's power system.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Review of Economics and Policies of Carbon Dioxide Removal.Current sustainable/renewable energy reports · 2025Review
- The value of long-duration energy storage under various grid conditions in a zero-emissions future.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Diverse decarbonization pathways under near cost-optimal futures.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Deployment expectations of multi-gigatonne scale carbon removal could have adverse impacts on Asia's energy-water-land nexus.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Implications of uncertainty in technology cost projections for least-cost decarbonized electricity systems.iScience · 2024Article
- A cross-scale framework for evaluating flexibility values of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Implications of accelerated and delayed climate action for Ireland's energy transition under carbon budgets.npj climate action · 2024Article
- The heterogeneous driving forces behind carbon emissions change in 30 selective emerging economies.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Economy-wide evaluation of CONature communications · 2022Article
- National priorities in the power system transition to net-zero: No one size fits all.iScience · 2022Article
- Article
- Fossil-Fuel Options for Power Sector Net-Zero Emissions with Sequestration Tax Credits.Environmental science & technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon dioxide removal technologies, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and direct air capture, are valuable for stringent climate targets. Previous work has examined implications of carbon removal, primarily bioenergy-based technologies using integrated assessment models, but not investigated the effects of a portfolio of removal options on power systems in detail. Here, we explore impacts of carbon removal technologies on electric sector investments, costs, and emissions using a detailed capacity planning and dispatch model with hourly resolution. We show that adding carbon removal to a mix of low-carbon generation technologies lowers the costs of deep decarbonization. Changes to system costs and investments from including carbon removal are larger as policy ambition increases, reducing the dependence on technologies like advanced nuclear and long-duration storage. Bioenergy with carbon capture is selected for net-zero electric sector emissions targets, but direct air capture deployment increases as biomass supply costs rise.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.