ArticleBDJ open2021
Evaluation of accuracy and reliability of OneCeph digital cephalometric analysis in comparison with manual cephalometric analysis-a cross-sectional study.
Article in BDJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06897852 (Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct Anthropometry), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Accuracy of Photogrammetric Three-Dimensional Facial Models Reconstruction Compared With Direct Anthropometry
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lateral Cephalometric Analytical Uses for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: The Importance of Cervical Posture and Hyoid Position.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Agreement Between WebCeph and Manual Cephalometric Analysis: Cleft and Non-Cleft Patients Comparison: A Retrospective Method-Comparison Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of W. Arnett's cephalometric analysis measurements performed using artificial intelligence and manual measurements.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Pediatric validation of an AI-assisted smartphone application (WebCeph) for cephalometric analysis: reliability, reproducibility and time-efficiency assessment.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of orthognathic surgery planning with artificial intelligence: a prospective, comparative study.European oral research · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Manual Cephalometric Analysis in Mouth-breathing Patients: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Accuracy and Reproducibility of Semidigital Versus Fully Digital Cephalometric Tracings Using a New Computer Program Versus Conventional Methods (Gold Standards): A Preliminary Study.BioMed research international · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Digital Cephalometric Tracing Applications on Mobile Devices and Manual Tracing.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Article
- Digital versus Manual Tracing in Cephalometric Analysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cephalometric Measurements Performed on Smartphone-Based Application and Computer-Based Imaging Software: A Comparative Study.Turkish journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- Influence of growth structures and fixed appliances on automated cephalometric landmark recognition with a customized convolutional neural network.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Analysis of the association between facial biotype, overbite and overjet in the permanent dentition.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Article
- Digital evaluation and correlation of facial growth patterns assessed on lateral CEPH and orthopantomogram through ONECEPH mobile application.Journal of orthodontic science · 2023Article
- BDJ Open 2021 - our most successful year to date.British dental journal · 2022Article
- Technique for Orthodontic Clinical Photographs Using a Smartphone.International journal of dentistry · 2022Review
- The Reliability of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Measurements: A CBCT Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLateral cephalometric analysis continues to be one of the gold standard diagnostic aids in orthodontics, with various software available to enhance this.
aimThis study was done to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of linear and angular measurements obtained from OneCeph digital cephalometric tracing and manual tracings in lateral cephalometry. METHODOLOGY: This is a cross-sectional study done on twenty pre-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects who reported to the postgraduate orthodontic clinic for orthodontic treatment over one month. Cephalometric tracings were done using OneCeph digital software and manual tracing method to evaluate nine parameters of Steiner's cephalometric analysis. An Independent T-sample test was done between the mean values of manual and OneCeph tracing. Intra operator reliability was evaluated by paired T-test after a week.
resultsNo significant statistical difference was observed as the p-value was greater than 0.05 for all the parameters in the two groups.
conclusionThe reliability and accuracy of OneCeph software application was found to be at par with manual cephalometric tracing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.