ArticleBMJ case reports2021
Treatment refractory
Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The COVID-19 pandemic: an underlying factor for increasedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Persistence ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Atypical Presentation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Stomatitis Post COVID-19 in an Immunocompetent Adolescent.Cureus · 2024Article
- Time-course transcriptome analysis of lungs from mice infected with inhaled aerosolizedJournal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Successful Treatment of PersistentOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Efficacy in Galleria mellonella Larvae and Application Potential Assessment of a New Bacteriophage BUCT700 Extensively Lyse Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Preclinical efficacy and safety of novel SNAT against SARS-CoV-2 using a hamster model.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infection Associated with COVID-19: A Case Series and Literature Review.The American journal of case reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.