Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34140248›Full record

Trial reportClinical lung cancer2021

Erlotinib and Onalespib Lactate Focused on EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A California Cancer Consortium Phase I/II Trial (NCI 9878).

Jonathan W Riess, Karen L Reckamp, Paul Frankel, Jeffrey Longmate, Karen A Kelly, David R Gandara, Caroline M Weipert, Victoria M Raymond, Harold N Keer, Philip C Mack and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical lung cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02535338 (A Phase 1/2 Trial of Erlotinib and Onalespib Lactate in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02535338 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1/2 Trial of Erlotinib and Onalespib Lactate in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2016 to 2021Enrolled11ConditionsRecurrent Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage IV Lung Non-Small Cell Cancer AJCC v7ArmsErlotinib Hydrochloride, Laboratory Biomarker Analysis, Onalespib Lactate, Pharmacological Study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The role of heat shock protein 90 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: state of the art.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan W RiessDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA. Electronic address: jwriess@ucdavis.edu.
Karen L ReckampCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Paul FrankelCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Jeffrey LongmateCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Karen A KellyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
David R GandaraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Caroline M WeipertGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Victoria M RaymondGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA.
Harold N KeerAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, CA.
Philip C MackDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; Tisch Cancer Institute-Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Edward M NewmanCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Primo N LaraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA.
UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer CenterCity of Hope · USGuardant (United States) · USAstex PharmaceuticalsCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USTisch Hospital · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Gina M Dayton · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Phase I Molecular and Clinical Pharmacodynamic Trials ETCTNUM1CA186717 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI A. Dimitrios Colevas, Alexey V. Danilov · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
UC Davis Paul Calabresi K12 Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA138464 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BIRKELAND, ANDREW CHARLES, LARA, PRIMO N. · 2011 to 2025
$11.4M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA138464NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnalespib is a novel heat shock protein 90 inhibitor (HSP90i). Previous preclinical and clinical studies with HSP90i have demonstrated activity in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of onalespib plus erlotinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and to evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the combination in epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFRex20ins) NSCLC. PATIENTS AND

methodsStandard 3+3 dose escalation was followed by a phase II expansion in EGFRex20ins. The phase II component targeted a response rate of 25% versus a background rate of 5%. Prospective next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 70 cancer-related genes, including EGFR, via plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was performed. Toxicity was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4, and response was determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1.

resultsEleven patients were treated (nine dose escalation, two dose expansion). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in dose level (DL) 0 and zero in DL -1 (minus). In 10 EGFRex20ins patients, no responses were observed, median progression-free survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval, 0.9-5.7), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40% (median, 3.5 months). EGFRex20ins was detected in nine of 10 ctDNA samples at baseline; on-treatment ctDNA clearance was not observed. Grade 3 diarrhea was the predominant toxicity in 45% of patients. The recommended phase II dose is DL -1 (minus): erlotinib 150 mg orally every morning and onalespib 120 mg/m

conclusionOverlapping toxicities of erlotinib and onalespib, mainly diarrhea, limited the tolerability of this combination, and limited clinical activity was observed, so the trial was closed early. Plasma EGFRex20ins ctDNA was detected in the majority of patients; failure to clear ctDNA was consistent with lack of tumor response (NCT02535338).

Indexed as

AgedBenzamidesCaliforniaErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideFemaleHumansIsoindolesLactatesLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationProspective Studies(2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-(5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dihydroisoindol-2-yl)methanoneBenzamidesEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideIsoindolesLactatescirculating tumor DNAEGFR Exon 20 insertionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitorHeat shock protein 90Heat shock protein inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34140248
PMCPMC9239707
OpenAlexW3163039186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.