Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34140245›Full record

ArticleUrologic oncology2021

Clinical value of

Ali Cahid Civelek, Scot A Niglio, Ashkan A Malayeri, Jeffrey Lin, Sandeep Gurram, Heather J Chalfin, Baris Turkbey, Vladimir Valera, Seth M Steinberg, Andrea B Apolo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Head-to-head comparison ofDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Innovative imaging techniques for urothelial carcinoma].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Performance ofiScience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Head-to-head comparison of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ali Cahid CivelekRadiology and Imaging Sciences Department, Nuclear Medicine Division, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Scot A NiglioGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Ashkan A MalayeriRadiology and Imaging Sciences Department, Nuclear Medicine Division, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Jeffrey LinGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Sandeep GurramUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Heather J ChalfinUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Baris TurkbeyRadiology and Imaging Sciences Department, Nuclear Medicine Division, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Vladimir ValeraUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Seth M SteinbergBiostatistics and Data Management Section, Office of the Clinical Director, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Andrea B ApoloGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: andrea.apolo@nih.gov.
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USData Management (Italy) · IT

Funding

Office of Collaborative BiostatisticsZIDSC007202 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOO-WOSOBA, HYOYOUNG · 2009 to 2025
$14.5M
Bladder Cancer ProgramZIABC011351 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI APOLO, ANDREA · 2010 to 2025
$9.4M
Imaging, image guided biopsy and treatment of prostate cancerZIABC012062 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TÜRKBEY, BARIS · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMetastatic bladder cancer is an aggressive disease that can often be difficult to diagnose and stage with conventional cross-sectional imaging. The primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical value of fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ( MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled patients with muscle-invasive, locally advanced and metastatic bladder cancer in a single institute evaluated with

resultsFifteen patients (4 for surveillance; 11 for restaging) underwent 34

conclusion

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18(18)F-FDG PET(18)F-FDG PET/MRIBladder cancerPET/MRISmall-cell bladder cancerUrothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID34140245
PMCPMC10211471
OpenAlexW3172507606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.